Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Effects of hydrogen-rich saline on endotoxin-induced uveitis

Yan WM, Zhang L, Chen T, Zhao GH, Long P, An J, Zhang ZM. · Medical Gas Research. 2017;7(1):9–18.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2017Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with severe or mild endotoxin-induced uveitis after footpad lipopolysaccharide injection.

Intervention and dose

Intraperitoneal hydrogen-rich saline at 10 or 20 mL/kg, given once or repeatedly before and after lipopolysaccharide according to four experiment-specific schedules. · Saline was supersaturated for six hours at 0.4 MPa and maintained above 0.6 mM H₂; gas preparation flow was not reported.

Duration

Schedules ranged from one post-endotoxin dose to one week of pretreatment plus repeated early doses and daily treatment for three weeks; outcomes extended to day 21.

Reported result

Hydrogen-rich saline did not significantly improve clinical uveitis signs, inflammatory-cell infiltration or impaired ERG timing in either severe or mild models. It significantly reduced aqueous-humor protein only in the mild model at 24 hours; dexamethasone improved the principal inflammatory measures.

Main limitation

Complex multi-part design, inconsistent reporting of a consolidated animal total, repeated-dose schedules, multiple endpoints/time points and an endotoxin model that does not represent all human uveitis. A Shaanxi science-platform grant funded the work; no explicit conflict statement was identified, so absence is not inferred.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized multi-part rat endotoxin-uveitis experiment with dexamethasone active control

Research topic

Eye health

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with severe or mild endotoxin-induced uveitis after footpad lipopolysaccharide injection.

Sample

The article reports separate experiments rather than one consolidated total: part 2 used 24 rats, dose-finding part 3 used 18, and part 4 used 96. The total for part 1 was not stated and no overall total is inferred.

Duration

Schedules ranged from one post-endotoxin dose to one week of pretreatment plus repeated early doses and daily treatment for three weeks; outcomes extended to day 21.

Intervention

Intraperitoneal hydrogen-rich saline at 10 or 20 mL/kg, given once or repeatedly before and after lipopolysaccharide according to four experiment-specific schedules.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

Dose or H₂ specification

Saline was supersaturated for six hours at 0.4 MPa and maintained above 0.6 mM H₂; gas preparation flow was not reported.

Comparator

Untreated normal and endotoxin-model groups plus intraperitoneal dexamethasone 1 mg/kg.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Slit-lamp uveitis scores, iris/ciliary-body inflammatory-cell infiltration, aqueous-humor protein and electroretinography.

Reported result

Hydrogen-rich saline did not significantly improve clinical uveitis signs, inflammatory-cell infiltration or impaired ERG timing in either severe or mild models. It significantly reduced aqueous-humor protein only in the mild model at 24 hours; dexamethasone improved the principal inflammatory measures.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, all four experimental parts and figures were checked for group allocation, dose/concentration, null and positive findings, masked ERG assessment, funding and available disclosures.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Complex multi-part design, inconsistent reporting of a consolidated animal total, repeated-dose schedules, multiple endpoints/time points and an endotoxin model that does not represent all human uveitis. A Shaanxi science-platform grant funded the work; no explicit conflict statement was identified, so absence is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Experimental endotoxin-induced uveitis in rats; the predominantly null findings do not establish a treatment for human eye inflammation.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28480027 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.202905

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.