Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Effects of hydrogen-rich saline on endotoxin-induced uveitis

Yan WM, Zhang L, Chen T, Zhao GH, Long P, An J, Zhang ZM. · Medical Gas Research. 2017;7(1):9–18.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2017
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized multi-part rat endotoxin-uveitis experiment with dexamethasone active control

Research topic

Eye health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with severe or mild endotoxin-induced uveitis after footpad lipopolysaccharide injection.

Sample

The article reports separate experiments rather than one consolidated total: part 2 used 24 rats, dose-finding part 3 used 18, and part 4 used 96. The total for part 1 was not stated and no overall total is inferred.

Duration

Schedules ranged from one post-endotoxin dose to one week of pretreatment plus repeated early doses and daily treatment for three weeks; outcomes extended to day 21.

Intervention

Intraperitoneal hydrogen-rich saline at 10 or 20 mL/kg, given once or repeatedly before and after lipopolysaccharide according to four experiment-specific schedules.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

H₂ specification

Saline was supersaturated for six hours at 0.4 MPa and maintained above 0.6 mM H₂; gas preparation flow was not reported.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — intraperitoneal H₂-rich saline, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

Untreated normal and endotoxin-model groups plus intraperitoneal dexamethasone 1 mg/kg.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Slit-lamp uveitis scores, iris/ciliary-body inflammatory-cell infiltration, aqueous-humor protein and electroretinography.

Reported result

Hydrogen-rich saline did not significantly improve clinical uveitis signs, inflammatory-cell infiltration or impaired ERG timing in either severe or mild models. It significantly reduced aqueous-humor protein only in the mild model at 24 hours; dexamethasone improved the principal inflammatory measures.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, all four experimental parts and figures were checked for group allocation, dose/concentration, null and positive findings, masked ERG assessment, funding and available disclosures.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Complex multi-part design, inconsistent reporting of a consolidated animal total, repeated-dose schedules, multiple endpoints/time points and an endotoxin model that does not represent all human uveitis. A Shaanxi science-platform grant funded the work; no explicit conflict statement was identified, so absence is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Experimental endotoxin-induced uveitis in rats; the predominantly null findings do not establish a treatment for human eye inflammation.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28480027 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.202905

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10