Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Possible clinical effects of molecular hydrogen (H₂) delivery during hemodialysis in chronic dialysis patients: Interim analysis in a 12 month observation

Nakayama M, Itami N, Suzuki H, et al. · PLOS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0184535.

HumanOther formsPublished 2017Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis at seven Japanese dialysis centers.

Intervention and dose

Electrolyzed-water hemodialysis three times weekly, generally 4–5 hours/session, using dialysate containing dissolved molecular H₂. · Dialysate H₂ concentration varied from 30 to 80 ppb; reported blood flow was 200 mL/min and dialysate flow 500 mL/min.

Duration

12 months; this publication is an interim analysis of the longer registered cohort.

Reported result

No clinically relevant group differences were found for dialysis-related parameters. Antihypertensive use and severe fatigue/pruritus were less frequent in E-HD in adjusted observational analyses, but the design cannot establish that H₂ caused those differences.

Main limitation

Non-randomized center-based comparison, important baseline differences, subjective outcomes and selection of only event-free participants with complete data create substantial selection and confounding risks. This interim cohort may overlap later E-HD publications and is not counted as an independent participant cohort without confirmation. Nihon Trim and the Electrolyzed Water-Hemodialysis Study Group funded the work; two authors were Nihon Trim employees.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Prospective multicenter non-randomized observational comparison; prespecified 12-month interim analysis

Research topic

Kidney and urinary health

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis at seven Japanese dialysis centers.

Sample

308 were registered; 262 selected participants with complete 12-month data and no hospitalization, new cancer or death were analyzed: E-HD n=140 and conventional HD n=122.

Duration

12 months; this publication is an interim analysis of the longer registered cohort.

Intervention

Electrolyzed-water hemodialysis three times weekly, generally 4–5 hours/session, using dialysate containing dissolved molecular H₂.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in dialysate — not inhaled, not swallowed and not Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

Dialysate H₂ concentration varied from 30 to 80 ppb; reported blood flow was 200 mL/min and dialysate flow 500 mL/min.

Comparator

Conventional hemodialysis at participating centers; treatment allocation was not randomized and treatment type was largely center-dependent.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Dialysis and laboratory parameters, antihypertensive drug dose, self-reported fatigue and pruritus and multivariable associations.

Reported result

No clinically relevant group differences were found for dialysis-related parameters. Antihypertensive use and severe fatigue/pruritus were less frequent in E-HD in adjusted observational analyses, but the design cannot establish that H₂ caused those differences.

Extraction completeness

The complete PLOS ONE/PMC article, protocol, cohort selection, laboratory and symptom tables, funding and competing-interest disclosure were checked; the broad null dialysis findings and favorable adjusted associations are both represented.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Non-randomized center-based comparison, important baseline differences, subjective outcomes and selection of only event-free participants with complete data create substantial selection and confounding risks. This interim cohort may overlap later E-HD publications and is not counted as an independent participant cohort without confirmation. Nihon Trim and the Electrolyzed Water-Hemodialysis Study Group funded the work; two authors were Nihon Trim employees.

Applies directly to

Maintenance-hemodialysis patients under this Japanese E-HD system; not evidence about drinking or inhaling H₂.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28902900 · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184535

Publisher access

Free full article on PLOS ONE and PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PLOS ONE and PMC full article, supporting protocol and PubMed metadata; full-text and article-status check completed 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.