Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hemodialysis employing molecular hydrogen (H₂) enriched dialysis solution may improve dialysis related fatigue through impact on energy metabolism

Nakayama M, Watanabe K, Sato E, et al. · Scientific Reports. 2025;15:5039.

HumanOther formsPublished 2025
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Prospective single-center uncontrolled before-and-after observational study

Research topic

Kidney and urinary health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis at one outpatient center.

Sample

92 consented; 81 completed 12 months and were analyzed: 25 with fatigue reducing activity, 24 with fatigue without activity reduction and 32 without fatigue.

Duration

Three sessions/week, 4–5 hours/session, followed for 12 months.

Intervention

All clinic patients switched from standard hemodialysis to an electrolyzed-water hemodialysis system containing dissolved H₂.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in dialysis solution — not inhaled, not swallowed and not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

Final dialysate contained 70–130 ppb dissolved H₂; composition, electrolytes and pH otherwise matched standard dialysate.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — H₂ was dissolved in dialysate, not delivered as inhaled gas.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as a distinct intervention.

Comparator

Participants' standard-hemodialysis baseline; no concurrent control group.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Fatigue numerical rating scales, body composition, biocompatibility markers, uremic toxins and exploratory metabolomics.

Reported result

In the 25-person fatigue-with-activity-reduction group, dialysis-day fatigue fell from 5.56±1.33 to 3.56±2.47 at 12 months (within-group p<0.05); no change occurred in the other baseline groups. HD-free-day fatigue was not significantly changed overall. NETosis markers were null; metabolomic findings were exploratory and based on 35 selected samples.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete Scientific Reports article, participant flow, dialysate concentration, all fatigue time points, body-composition, null biocompatibility results, metabolomics, funding and competing interests were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

No concurrent control, universal clinic-wide switch, subjective fatigue, older single-center cohort and regression to the mean are major limitations. The metabolomic pathway interpretation is exploratory. Eleven consented patients did not complete follow-up. Tohoku University Hospital funding was reported; authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Maintenance-hemodialysis patients in this outpatient program; not evidence for drinking or inhaling H₂.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 39934143 · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88827-2

Publisher access

Open-access full article on Scientific Reports and PMC.

Extraction basis

Scientific Reports publisher and PMC full articles plus PubMed record; full-text and article-status check completed 8 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10