Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Protective effect of hydrogen-saturated saline on acute lung injury induced by oleic acid in rats.

Ying Y, Xu H, Yao M, Qin Z. · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2017;12:133.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2017
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized controlled rat study

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Positive preclinical signal.

Outcome type

Animal physiologic, tissue and biomarker outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male Sprague-Dawley rats in an oleic-acid acute-lung-injury model.

Sample

40 rats; 10 each in control, injury, intravenous hydrogen-saline and intraperitoneal hydrogen-saline groups.

Duration

Three hours after injury induction.

Intervention

Hydrogen-saturated saline, 5 mL/kg intravenously or intraperitoneally five minutes after injury induction.

Hydrogen form

H2 dissolved in saline; not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

Hydrogen concentration was maintained at approximately 0.6 mmol/L.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — injection.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

Uninjured control and injured saline-control groups.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Arterial oxygenation, lung histology, edema and inflammatory and oxidative biomarkers.

Reported result

Both hydrogen-saline routes improved several oxygenation, histologic and inflammatory outcomes; intraperitoneal delivery was stronger on selected measures.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article, methods, group comparisons and measured endpoints were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Short-duration animal model; results do not establish benefit in human acute lung injury.

Applies directly to

The reported oleic-acid rat model.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Small groups and incomplete reporting of concealment and assessor blinding.

Appraisal domains

Randomization/allocation reporting is limited · Blinding of personnel is unclear · Attrition is incompletely reported in places · Blinding of outcome assessors is unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28927460 · DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0633-9

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PubMed record and PubMed Central full text; extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10