Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Novel haemodialysis treatment employing molecular hydrogen-enriched dialysis solution improves prognosis of chronic dialysis patients: a prospective observational study

Nakayama M et al. · Sci Rep. 2018;8:254.

HumanOther formsPublished 2018
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Non-randomized, non-blinded prospective multicenter observational comparison

Research topic

Kidney and urinary health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adults receiving chronic maintenance hemodialysis

Sample

309 patients: H₂-enriched dialysis n=161; conventional dialysis n=148

Duration

Mean observation 3.28 years; dialysis three times weekly

Intervention

Hemodialysis with 30–80 ppb H₂-enriched dialysate, three sessions per week for 4–5 hours

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in dialysis solution — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas and not inhalation.

H₂ specification

30–80 ppb dissolved H₂; approximately 1.2 mmol H₂ estimated to enter the patient during a 4-hour session at 50 ppb.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — H₂ was dissolved in dialysate. Dialysate flow was 500 mL/min, but this is not an H₂ gas-flow value.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the H₂ intervention.

Comparator

Conventional hemodialysis with dialysate H₂ below 1 ppb

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal cardio-cerebrovascular events; blood pressure, medications, dialysis parameters, fatigue and pruritus

Reported result

There were 91 composite events: 41 with H₂-enriched dialysis and 50 with conventional dialysis. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.59 (95% CI 0.38–0.92), while the unadjusted association was not statistically significant.

Results-extraction completeness

Methods, results, registration, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Treatment was selected by physicians rather than randomized, the H₂ group was younger, and residual confounding is likely. The favorable estimate appeared after multivariable adjustment. Nihon Trim, manufacturer of the electrolysis system, funded the study; authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Chronic hemodialysis patients in Japanese centers using this specific H₂-enriched dialysate system.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 29321509 · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18537-x

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed record.

Record revision

2026-08-10