Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Inhalation of molecular hydrogen prevents ischemia-reperfusion liver damage during major liver resection

Malý O, Zajak J, Hyšpler R, Turek Z, Astapenko D, Jun D, Váňová N, Kohout A, Radochová V, Kotek J, Páral J. · Annals of Translational Medicine. 2019;7(23):774.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2019Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Healthy domestic pigs undergoing a liver-resection model with 120 minutes of warm ischemia followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion.

Intervention and dose

H₂ was added from induction of general anesthesia through surgery and the end of the experiment in a closed-circuit anesthesia machine. · 2% H₂, 40% O₂ and 58% N₂ at a reported total fresh-gas flow of 1 L/min, with isoflurane used for anesthesia.

Duration

From anesthesia induction through 120 minutes of warm liver ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion.

Reported result

Liver histology scores were lower with H₂. Most biochemical outcomes—including ALT, AST, ALP, LD, lactate and creatine-kinase BB—and the tested plasma and liver oxidative-damage markers did not differ significantly; gamma-glutamyl-transferase was the notable significant biochemical finding.

Main limitation

Only 12 pigs, acute terminal experiment, surrogate histological and biochemical endpoints, no postoperative recovery or clinical outcome and multiple comparisons. The authors' language is stronger than the mixed result set. The Czech Ministry of Defence funded the work; the authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized controlled large-animal surgical experiment

Research topic

Liver health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy domestic pigs undergoing a liver-resection model with 120 minutes of warm ischemia followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion.

Sample

12 pigs: inhaled-H₂ group n=6 and control anesthesia group n=6.

Duration

From anesthesia induction through 120 minutes of warm liver ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion.

Intervention

H₂ was added from induction of general anesthesia through surgery and the end of the experiment in a closed-circuit anesthesia machine.

Hydrogen form

H₂ alone added to an oxygen/nitrogen anesthesia carrier — not Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

2% H₂, 40% O₂ and 58% N₂ at a reported total fresh-gas flow of 1 L/min, with isoflurane used for anesthesia.

H₂ flow

20 mL/min H₂, calculated from 1,000 mL/min total flow × 2% H₂.

O₂ delivered with H₂

40% O₂; 400 mL/min O₂, calculated from 1,000 mL/min × 40%. The remaining carrier was 580 mL/min N₂, apart from anesthetic vapor.

Comparator

The same surgery and general-anesthesia protocol without added H₂; the control carrier contained 40% O₂ and 58–60% N₂.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Liver histology and Suzuki injury score, ALT, AST, ALP, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, lactate, creatine-kinase BB and plasma/tissue oxidative-damage markers.

Reported result

Liver histology scores were lower with H₂. Most biochemical outcomes—including ALT, AST, ALP, LD, lactate and creatine-kinase BB—and the tested plasma and liver oxidative-damage markers did not differ significantly; gamma-glutamyl-transferase was the notable significant biochemical finding.

Extraction completeness

The complete free publisher article, randomization, anesthesia mixture, total flow, surgical timing, positive and null results, funding and conflict statement were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Only 12 pigs, acute terminal experiment, surrogate histological and biochemical endpoints, no postoperative recovery or clinical outcome and multiple comparisons. The authors' language is stronger than the mixed result set. The Czech Ministry of Defence funded the work; the authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Applies directly to

Preclinical liver ischemia-reperfusion model in pigs; it does not establish efficacy or safety during human liver surgery.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 32042790 · DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.43

Publisher access

Free publisher full article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Annals of Translational Medicine publisher article, PubMed Central copy and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.