Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Changes of nasal nitric oxide in the treatment of allergic rhinitis with hydrogen-rich saline lavage of nasal cavity

Jin L, Fan K, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Ge Q, Wang Y, Yu S. · Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2020;34(3):244–247.

HumanOther formsPublished 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Adults with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis.

Intervention and dose

A 100 mL bag of hydrogen-saturated sterile 0.9% saline was used for nasal lavage: 50 mL per nostril, morning and evening, for four weeks. · The article calls the solution hydrogen-saturated but does not report a measured numerical dissolved-H₂ concentration.

Duration

Four weeks per condition with a washout of at least four weeks and return of symptom scores to baseline before crossover.

Reported result

Mean nasal nitric oxide after four weeks was 366.45 ppb with hydrogen-rich saline and 503.25 ppb with normal saline; the mean change was 242.5 versus 97.95 ppb (p=0.002). The current article focuses on this surrogate marker. The 75% versus 55% symptom-response figures originated from the earlier report of the same cohort and are not counted as an independent 20-person study.

Main limitation

Only 20 participants at one center, short follow-up, limited reporting of sequence generation/concealment and an unmeasured H₂ concentration. Nasal nitric oxide is a surrogate outcome. This article overlaps the cohort reported under DOI 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.07.004 and is not independent participant evidence. No funding or conflict statement was located in the accessible article; Hydrogenology does not infer absence.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized double-blind self-controlled crossover study

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adults with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis.

Sample

20 participants (11 men and 9 women, aged 19–63 years); all completed both conditions.

Duration

Four weeks per condition with a washout of at least four weeks and return of symptom scores to baseline before crossover.

Intervention

A 100 mL bag of hydrogen-saturated sterile 0.9% saline was used for nasal lavage: 50 mL per nostril, morning and evening, for four weeks.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline — nasal lavage, not inhaled gas, swallowed water or Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

The article calls the solution hydrogen-saturated but does not report a measured numerical dissolved-H₂ concentration.

Comparator

The same participants received normal 0.9% saline lavage under the crossover protocol.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Weekly nasal nitric oxide; symptom-response information was linked to an earlier report from the same cohort.

Reported result

Mean nasal nitric oxide after four weeks was 366.45 ppb with hydrogen-rich saline and 503.25 ppb with normal saline; the mean change was 242.5 versus 97.95 ppb (p=0.002). The current article focuses on this surrogate marker. The 75% versus 55% symptom-response figures originated from the earlier report of the same cohort and are not counted as an independent 20-person study.

Extraction completeness

The complete free Chinese journal article/PMC copy, crossover schedule, volumes, weekly nasal-nitric-oxide results and cohort overlap with the earlier symptom paper were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Only 20 participants at one center, short follow-up, limited reporting of sequence generation/concealment and an unmeasured H₂ concentration. Nasal nitric oxide is a surrogate outcome. This article overlaps the cohort reported under DOI 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.07.004 and is not independent participant evidence. No funding or conflict statement was located in the accessible article; Hydrogenology does not infer absence.

Applies directly to

Short-term nasal-lavage effects on nasal nitric oxide in persistent allergic rhinitis; clinical benefit requires larger independent trials.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 32791592 · DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.03.014

Publisher access

Free journal full article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Free journal article, PubMed metadata and PubMed Central copy; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.