Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Changes of nasal nitric oxide in the treatment of allergic rhinitis with hydrogen-rich saline lavage of nasal cavity

Jin L, Fan K, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Ge Q, Wang Y, Yu S. · Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2020;34(3):244–247.

HumanOther formsPublished 2020
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Randomized double-blind self-controlled crossover study

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adults with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis.

Sample

20 participants (11 men and 9 women, aged 19–63 years); all completed both conditions.

Duration

Four weeks per condition with a washout of at least four weeks and return of symptom scores to baseline before crossover.

Intervention

A 100 mL bag of hydrogen-saturated sterile 0.9% saline was used for nasal lavage: 50 mL per nostril, morning and evening, for four weeks.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline — nasal lavage, not inhaled gas, swallowed water or Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

The article calls the solution hydrogen-saturated but does not report a measured numerical dissolved-H₂ concentration.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — nasal liquid lavage, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

The same participants received normal 0.9% saline lavage under the crossover protocol.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Weekly nasal nitric oxide; symptom-response information was linked to an earlier report from the same cohort.

Reported result

Mean nasal nitric oxide after four weeks was 366.45 ppb with hydrogen-rich saline and 503.25 ppb with normal saline; the mean change was 242.5 versus 97.95 ppb (p=0.002). The current article focuses on this surrogate marker. The 75% versus 55% symptom-response figures originated from the earlier report of the same cohort and are not counted as an independent 20-person study.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free Chinese journal article/PMC copy, crossover schedule, volumes, weekly nasal-nitric-oxide results and cohort overlap with the earlier symptom paper were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Only 20 participants at one center, short follow-up, limited reporting of sequence generation/concealment and an unmeasured H₂ concentration. Nasal nitric oxide is a surrogate outcome. This article overlaps the cohort reported under DOI 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.07.004 and is not independent participant evidence. No funding or conflict statement was located in the accessible article; Hydrogenology does not infer absence.

Applies directly to

Short-term nasal-lavage effects on nasal nitric oxide in persistent allergic rhinitis; clinical benefit requires larger independent trials.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 32791592 · DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.03.014

Publisher access

Free journal full article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Free journal article, PubMed metadata and PubMed Central copy; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10