Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Prevention of Chronic Rejection of Marginal Kidney Graft by Using a Hydrogen Gas-Containing Preservation Solution and Adequate Immunosuppression in a Miniature Pig Model

Nishi K, Iwai S, Tajima K, Okano S, Sano M, Kobayashi E. · Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;11:626295.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2021
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled donor-after-cardiac-death kidney-transplant study in mature microminiature pigs

Research topic

Kidney and urinary health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Four donor and eight recipient microminiature pigs; ischemic kidneys were transplanted across non-matched swine-leukocyte-antigen backgrounds with multidrug immunosuppression.

Sample

12 pigs overall. Recipient groups were hydrogenated preservation solution n=4, non-hydrogenated solution n=3 and one living-donor reference recipient n=1.

Duration

Ten-minute rinse, 60 or 240 minutes of cold storage, then follow-up to 100 days or humane endpoint.

Intervention

Donor kidneys were rinsed for ten minutes and stored for 60 or 240 minutes at 4°C in hydrogenated ETK preservation solution before transplantation.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in organ-preservation solution — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

H₂ specification

Dissolved H₂ was maintained at at least 1 ppm for four hours. The preparation paragraph prints an internal container-pressure value of '0.06 ppm', which is dimensionally inconsistent and is preserved as a source issue rather than corrected by inference.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — dissolved H₂ organ-preservation solution, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the H₂ intervention.

Comparator

Non-hydrogenated ETK after the same 20-minute donor ischemia, plus one living-donor reference kidney.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Survival, urine output, BUN/creatinine, renal blood flow and resistive index, CT perfusion, thrombosis, histopathology, chronic rejection/fibrosis and syndecan-1.

Reported result

Three of four hydrogenated-solution recipients reached 100 days; the fourth had major ureteral obstruction/intervention. All three non-hydrogenated ischemic-kidney recipients were sacrificed on days 3–7 with anuria, thrombosis and worsening kidney function. Long-term H₂ grafts had absent or mild chronic rejection, but the comparison was extremely small and not balanced for all surgical details.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, tables and supplement descriptions were checked for donor/recipient counts, preparation concentration, the printed unit inconsistency, storage schedules, survival and graft findings, complications, limitations, commercial funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Only four treated and three ischemic controls, one living reference, unknown SLA haplotypes, surgical/ischemic heterogeneity, major ureteral complication, extensive immunosuppression and limited mechanistic tissue assays. Doctors Man funded the work and helped devise the H₂-infusion system; two authors were medical advisers to the company.

Applies directly to

Experimental marginal-kidney transplantation in mature miniature pigs; it does not establish human graft preservation or rejection prevention.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 33679720 · DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.626295

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article, supplementary descriptions and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10