Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Molecular Hydrogen Positively Affects Physical and Respiratory Function in Acute Post-COVID-19 Patients

Botek M et al. · Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1992.

HumanOther formsPublished 2022Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Non-hospitalized, unvaccinated adults tested 21–35 days after acute COVID-19

Intervention and dose

Nasal-cannula H₂ at 300 mL/min for two 60-minute home sessions daily · 99.99% H₂ source-gas purity according to the generator manual.

Duration

Two 60-minute sessions daily for 14 days

Reported result

Changes favored H₂ for six-minute walk distance, FVC and FEV1. Daily fatigue, sleep, muscle soreness and dyspnea ratings did not differ between groups; oxygen saturation and exertion comparisons were also null.

Main limitation

Single-blind, 50-person short trial with baseline BMI and body-fat imbalance and home self-administration. It concerns early post-acute recovery, not established Long COVID. Authors declared no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized single-blind placebo-controlled parallel trial

Research topic

Long COVID

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Non-hospitalized, unvaccinated adults tested 21–35 days after acute COVID-19

Sample

50 participants: 26 men and 24 women

Duration

Two 60-minute sessions daily for 14 days

Intervention

Nasal-cannula H₂ at 300 mL/min for two 60-minute home sessions daily

Hydrogen form

H₂ alone at high source-gas purity — not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

99.99% H₂ source-gas purity according to the generator manual.

Comparator

Ambient air from a modified generator

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Six-minute walk, FVC, FEV1, oxygen saturation, dyspnea, exertion and daily symptom ratings

Reported result

Changes favored H₂ for six-minute walk distance, FVC and FEV1. Daily fatigue, sleep, muscle soreness and dyspnea ratings did not differ between groups; oxygen saturation and exertion comparisons were also null.

Extraction completeness

Gas purity, flow, methods, full outcome tables, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Single-blind, 50-person short trial with baseline BMI and body-fat imbalance and home self-administration. It concerns early post-acute recovery, not established Long COVID. Authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Clinically stable, non-hospitalized adults 21–35 days after COVID-19 under the study criteria.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 35206179 · DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041992

Publisher access

Open-access publisher and PMC full texts are available.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed bibliographic record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.