Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen inhalation in rehabilitation program of the medical staff recovered from COVID-19

Shogenova LV, Truong TT, Kryukova NO, et al. · Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2021;20(6):2986.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2021Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthcare workers recovering from COVID-19 with post-COVID symptoms.

Intervention and dose

Hydrogen delivered by nasal cannula from a SUISONIA device for 90 minutes daily for 10 days, alongside standard rehabilitation. · The full article does not report source-gas H₂ concentration or purity.

Duration

90 minutes daily for 10 days.

Reported result

The hydrogen group showed within-group changes in several measures, including 6-minute walk distance from 429±45 to 569±60 m. The article reports no procedure-related adverse effects; interpretation is limited by attrition and incomplete between-group reporting.

Main limitation

Small, apparently unblinded rehabilitation study with five dropouts and many endpoints. Several reported changes are within-group rather than clearly demonstrated treatment-versus-control effects. Gas concentration and flow are absent, and the article's unusual 'active hydrogen' chemical description should not be treated as established chemistry.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized controlled parallel prospective study

Research topic

Long COVID

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthcare workers recovering from COVID-19 with post-COVID symptoms.

Sample

60 randomized: hydrogen plus standard rehabilitation n=30 and standard rehabilitation n=30; 27 and 28 completed, respectively.

Duration

90 minutes daily for 10 days.

Intervention

Hydrogen delivered by nasal cannula from a SUISONIA device for 90 minutes daily for 10 days, alongside standard rehabilitation.

Hydrogen form

The article calls the intervention an 'active form of hydrogen' from a metal-hydride source; it is not described as Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

The full article does not report source-gas H₂ concentration or purity.

H₂ flow

Not reported in the full article.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ concentration or O₂ flow is reported; no co-delivery is inferred.

Comparator

Standard rehabilitation including physiotherapy and supportive medication.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Endothelial indices, 6-minute walking distance, blood gases, lactate, inflammatory markers and adverse effects.

Reported result

The hydrogen group showed within-group changes in several measures, including 6-minute walk distance from 429±45 to 569±60 m. The article reports no procedure-related adverse effects; interpretation is limited by attrition and incomplete between-group reporting.

Extraction completeness

The free bilingual publisher full article, methods, tables, results and adverse-event statement were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small, apparently unblinded rehabilitation study with five dropouts and many endpoints. Several reported changes are within-group rather than clearly demonstrated treatment-versus-control effects. Gas concentration and flow are absent, and the article's unusual 'active hydrogen' chemical description should not be treated as established chemistry.

Applies directly to

Healthcare workers in post-COVID rehabilitation under the reported protocol.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

OpenAlex ID: W3205504592 · DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2986

Publisher access

Open-access publisher article.

Extraction basis

Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention full article; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.