Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of hydrogen/oxygen inhalation for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Tao G et al. · J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26(14):4113–4123.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2022Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Adults aged 30–70 with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Intervention and dose

Mixed gas by inhalation at 3,000 mL/min for 1 hour daily · 66% H₂ + 33% O₂ by volume as reported; the remaining 1% is not specified.

Duration

13 weeks

Reported result

Several lipid and liver-enzyme measures improved. In moderate-to-severe subgroups, imaging changes favored H₂–O₂; the complete sample was small and subgroup analyses were emphasized.

Main limitation

Nineteen of 62 randomized participants did not complete the study, the analyzed sample was 43, and imaging claims emphasize small severity subgroups. Asclepius Meditec provided generators; authors declared no conflicts and public grants funded the work.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized placebo-controlled parallel trial with additional animal and cell experiments

Research topic

Liver health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adults aged 30–70 with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Sample

62 randomized; 43 completed: H₂–O₂ n=21 and placebo n=22

Duration

13 weeks

Intervention

Mixed gas by inhalation at 3,000 mL/min for 1 hour daily

Hydrogen form

Brown’s gas / oxyhydrogen — H₂ and O₂ co-delivered, not H₂ alone.

Dose or H₂ specification

66% H₂ + 33% O₂ by volume as reported; the remaining 1% is not specified.

H₂ flow

1,980 mL/min H₂, calculated as 3,000 mL/min total mixed-gas flow × 66% H₂.

O₂ delivered with H₂

990 mL/min O₂, calculated as 3,000 mL/min × 33% O₂.

Comparator

Normal air containing 78.1% N₂ and 20.9% O₂ at 3,000 mL/min

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Liver enzymes, lipids, ultrasound and CT liver-fat measures, oxidative and inflammatory markers

Reported result

Several lipid and liver-enzyme measures improved. In moderate-to-severe subgroups, imaging changes favored H₂–O₂; the complete sample was small and subgroup analyses were emphasized.

Extraction completeness

Human intervention, gas composition, flow, outcome tables, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Nineteen of 62 randomized participants did not complete the study, the analyzed sample was 43, and imaging claims emphasize small severity subgroups. Asclepius Meditec provided generators; authors declared no conflicts and public grants funded the work.

Applies directly to

Adults with NAFLD meeting the study criteria; the animal and cell experiments do not add independent human participants.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 35734974 · DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.17456

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed bibliographic record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.