Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Optimized dose of hydrogen-enriched water with minocycline combination therapy in experimental ischemic stroke

Jiang Z, Alamuri TT, Yang DL, Annarino T, Muir ER, Duong TQ. · Brain Research. 2025;1866:149940.

PreclinicalH₂-rich waterPublished 2025
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blinded rat dose-response study; the 30 mL/kg group was added later and was unblinded

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Sixty-six male and female Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to 60-minute middle cerebral artery occlusion followed by reperfusion.

Sample

66 rats. Male dose groups: vehicle n=8, H₂ water 5 mL/kg n=6, 10 mL/kg n=6, 20 mL/kg n=8 and 30 mL/kg n=6; additional male H₂ 20 mL/kg plus minocycline n=8. Female vehicle, H₂ 20 mL/kg and combination groups each had n=8.

Duration

Three administrations: immediately after reperfusion and on post-stroke days 1 and 2; neurological score and infarct volume were assessed on day 7.

Intervention

Hydrogen-enriched water by gastric gavage immediately after reperfusion and again on days 1 and 2; doses were 5, 10, 20 or 30 mL/kg. Combination groups also received minocycline 20 mg/kg intraperitoneally.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water — H₂ only, not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

Near-saturated water was made with two magnesium-based Rejuvenation H2 tablets in 500 mL water for 24 hours at 4°C. Measured H₂ averaged 3.18 ± 0.21 ppm (range 2.7-3.9 ppm). Placebo tablets produced vehicle water.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — gavaged water, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the H₂ intervention.

Comparator

Placebo-tablet vehicle water at matched fluid volume; H₂ dose groups and H₂-plus-minocycline groups.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Garcia neurological score and TTC-stained infarct volume at seven days, with dose-response modelling and sex comparisons.

Reported result

The 20 mL/kg group had the best mean Garcia score and smallest mean infarct volume. In males, 20 mL/kg differed from vehicle and lower doses but not from 30 mL/kg for Garcia score (p=0.54); infarct volume differed from vehicle and 5 mL/kg, not every dose. H₂ plus minocycline produced better outcomes than H₂ alone; no sex difference was detected in the tested optimal-dose arms.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, allocations, intervention preparation, measured H₂ concentration, all dose groups, outcome table, null comparisons, stated limitations and funding were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Preclinical pilot study; only the selected arms included females, the estrous cycle was not monitored, the 30 mL/kg group was unblinded and added after other results, treatment began immediately after reperfusion, and minocycline was tested at one fixed dose. Commercial H₂ and placebo tablets and a commercial H₂ test kit were used. NIH grants funded the study; no explicit conflict declaration was identified in the article, so absence of a conflict is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Experimental ischemic stroke in rats; it does not establish a human stroke treatment or dosing schedule.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 40935311 · DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149940

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10