Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

The gastroprotective effect of hydrogen-rich coral calcium in a mouse model of peptic ulcer disease

Wu HT, Hsieh MT, Ou HY, Chao TH, Tsai LM. · Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2025;19:9845–9851.

PreclinicalH₂-rich waterPublished 2025Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice exposed to hydrochloric-acid/60% ethanol gastric injury.

Intervention and dose

Oral hydrogen-rich coral calcium (HRCC) before HCl/ethanol injury, compared with non-hydrogen porous coral calcium. · The actual study batch's H₂ content/release was not measured. The introduction cites up to 14.72 ppm in water for this technology generally, which is not treated as the administered dose. The methods list 105/210 mg/kg, while figure legends repeatedly list 210/420 mg/kg.

Duration

Thirty-minute pretreatment before acute ex-vivo injury or once-daily pretreatment/injury for seven days in vivo.

Reported result

HRCC groups showed less macroscopic/histologic gastric injury, lower inflammatory-gene expression and higher antioxidant-enzyme expression than injured coral-calcium controls, with reported dose gradients. Interpretation is limited by the unresolved two-fold dose discrepancy and absence of measured product H₂ exposure.

Main limitation

Chemical-injury mouse model, preventive rather than therapeutic timing, small samples, selected assays n=3, unmeasured H₂ exposure, complex coral-calcium product and conflicting doses between methods and figure legends. A hospital managed by a medical-care corporation funded the study; authors declared no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized four-group mouse HCl/ethanol gastric-injury study with ex-vivo and seven-day in-vivo experiments

Research topic

Gastrointestinal health

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice exposed to hydrochloric-acid/60% ethanol gastric injury.

Sample

Four groups of six mice were reported; selected Western blots used n=3/group. Whether the ex-vivo and in-vivo stages used distinct animal cohorts is not made explicit.

Duration

Thirty-minute pretreatment before acute ex-vivo injury or once-daily pretreatment/injury for seven days in vivo.

Intervention

Oral hydrogen-rich coral calcium (HRCC) before HCl/ethanol injury, compared with non-hydrogen porous coral calcium.

Hydrogen form

H₂ held/released by an oral coral-calcium product — not Brown's gas, not inhaled H₂ and not H₂-rich water.

Dose or H₂ specification

The actual study batch's H₂ content/release was not measured. The introduction cites up to 14.72 ppm in water for this technology generally, which is not treated as the administered dose. The methods list 105/210 mg/kg, while figure legends repeatedly list 210/420 mg/kg.

Comparator

Porous coral calcium at a matched reported dose, with and without HCl/ethanol injury.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Macroscopic ulcer damage, gastric histology/immune infiltration, Tnfa/Ccl2/Il6 gene expression and catalase/GPx/SOD1 protein expression.

Reported result

HRCC groups showed less macroscopic/histologic gastric injury, lower inflammatory-gene expression and higher antioxidant-enzyme expression than injured coral-calcium controls, with reported dose gradients. Interpretation is limited by the unresolved two-fold dose discrepancy and absence of measured product H₂ exposure.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, methods, figures and disclosures were checked for animal groups, oral route, coral-calcium comparator, absent H₂ assay, methods/figure dose discrepancy, all main outcomes, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Chemical-injury mouse model, preventive rather than therapeutic timing, small samples, selected assays n=3, unmeasured H₂ exposure, complex coral-calcium product and conflicting doses between methods and figure legends. A hospital managed by a medical-care corporation funded the study; authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Preventive gastric-injury findings in mice; they do not establish ulcer treatment, product dose or safety in humans.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 41221497 · DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S555188

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.