Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Breath hydrogen produced by ingestion of commercial hydrogen water and milk.

Shimouchi A, Nose K, Yamaguchi M, Ishiguro H, Kondo T. · 2009.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2009
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Small uncontrolled pharmacokinetic comparison

Research topic

Other molecular hydrogen research

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Acute dose-related breath-hydrogen signal.

Outcome type

Human pharmacokinetic surrogate outcome.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Five adults without specified disease.

Sample

5 participants.

Duration

Acute breath-hydrogen monitoring after ingestion.

Intervention

Ingestion of commercial hydrogen water, distilled water and milk on separate test conditions.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in drinking water.

H₂ specification

Dose-response water volumes are reported in the article; breath exposure was measured rather than systemic dose.

H₂ flow

Not applicable.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

Distilled water and milk reference conditions.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

End-alveolar breath-hydrogen concentration and time course.

Reported result

Hydrogen water produced a rapid, dose-related breath-hydrogen peak around 10–15 minutes that returned toward baseline sooner than after milk.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article was checked for methods, intervention details, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflicts. This record does not imply medical efficacy.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Five-person pharmacokinetic experiment with no health outcome; breath hydrogen does not establish therapeutic efficacy.

Applies directly to

Healthy adults under this acute ingestion test only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

ROBINS-I — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Serious concerns

Appraisal rationale

Very small uncontrolled experiment, unclear order effects and a surrogate exposure measure only.

Appraisal domains

Selection and allocation checked · Confounding and co-interventions remain possible · Missing observations checked where reported · Outcome measurement varies by endpoint · Selective reporting cannot be excluded

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 19652760 · DOI: 10.4137/bmi.s2209

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official PubMed Central full article and PubMed bibliographic record; source identity, methods, intervention, results, funding and conflicts checked 10 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10