Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Pilot study: Effects of drinking hydrogen-rich water on muscle fatigue caused by acute exercise in elite athletes

Aoki K et al. · Med Gas Res. 2012;2:12.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2012Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Male soccer players in daily training

Intervention and dose

Three 500 mL bottles: one at 22:00 before testing and two at 05:00 and 06:20 on the test day; 1,500 mL total · 0.92–1.02 mM dissolved H₂, generated by magnesium sticks after 24 hours.

Duration

Each participant completed both conditions at one-week intervals; acute exercise observation

Reported result

The paper reports lower post-exercise blood lactate with H₂ water than placebo and no early decline in peak torque; oxidative markers, creatine kinase and EMG frequency measures did not differ between conditions.

Main limitation

Very small pilot sample, acute protocol and multiple outcomes; no female, untrained or recreational participants. Product-specific magnesium sticks were used; authors declared no competing interests and reported a Daimaru Research Foundation grant.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Double-blind crossover pilot study

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Male soccer players in daily training

Sample

10 participants

Duration

Each participant completed both conditions at one-week intervals; acute exercise observation

Intervention

Three 500 mL bottles: one at 22:00 before testing and two at 05:00 and 06:20 on the test day; 1,500 mL total

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

0.92–1.02 mM dissolved H₂, generated by magnesium sticks after 24 hours.

Comparator

Mineral water prepared with visually matched placebo sticks; measured H₂ concentration 0

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Blood lactate, oxidative-stress markers, creatine kinase, peak torque and muscle activity

Reported result

The paper reports lower post-exercise blood lactate with H₂ water than placebo and no early decline in peak torque; oxidative markers, creatine kinase and EMG frequency measures did not differ between conditions.

Extraction completeness

Methods, principal results, funding and competing-interest statements checked in the free full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Very small pilot sample, acute protocol and multiple outcomes; no female, untrained or recreational participants. Product-specific magnesium sticks were used; authors declared no competing interests and reported a Daimaru Research Foundation grant.

Applies directly to

Young trained male soccer players completing the study exercise protocol.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Cochrane RoB 2 crossover variant · post-exercise lactate and peak-torque results

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns — preliminary; independent reviewer pending

Appraisal rationale

Very small crossover pilot. Double blinding and placebo sticks are described, but allocation sequence, concealment, period effects and multiplicity need fuller assessment.

Appraisal domains

Some concerns — crossover order and concealment are not sufficiently described in the extracted methods. · Some concerns — placebo sticks and double blinding are reported; adherence beyond preparation instructions is limited. · Low concern in the displayed report — all 10 participants appear in the analyzed crossover data. · Low to some concerns — largely objective laboratory and performance measures, though operator blinding is not fully described. · Some concerns — numerous biochemical and performance outcomes without a registered analysis plan identified.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 22520831 · DOI: 10.1186/2045-9912-2-12

Publisher access

Open-access article.

Extraction basis

Free full text on PMC; bibliographic identifiers cross-checked in PubMed.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.