Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Successful treatment with hydrogen rich water in a case of chronic graft-versus-host-disease

Qian LR, Shen JL. · Medical Gas Research. 2016;6(3):177–179.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2016
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Single-patient case report

Research topic

Immune and inflammatory conditions

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

A 54-year-old man with severe chronic graft-versus-host disease three years after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome, with symptoms uncontrolled by prednisone and tacrolimus.

Sample

One patient.

Duration

Clinical characteristics were reassessed after 3 and 6 months.

Intervention

Hydrogen-rich water 500 mL three times daily was added while prednisone 10 mg/day and tacrolimus 0.5 mg continued and were tapered over three months.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in drinking water — H₂ only, not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

The article reports 0.6 mmol/L dissolved H₂ and 1,500 mL/day total water volume.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — drinking water, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

None.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

NIH chronic-GVHD clinical characteristics, immunosuppressant taper and descriptive quality-of-life status.

Reported result

The article reports improvement in the patient's clinical characteristics at 3 and 6 months, tapering of prednisone and tacrolimus over three months, and survival with good reported quality of life at publication. No control, blinded assessment or counterfactual is available.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete PubMed Central case report, dose, concentration, concurrent drugs, follow-up, funding and conflict statement were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

A single uncontrolled case cannot establish causality. Improvement could reflect concurrent immunosuppression, tapering decisions, disease fluctuation or other care. This publication preceded and is distinct from the later 24-patient phase-2 study. Funding came from the Innovative Cultivation Foundation of Chinese Navy General Hospital (CXPY201603); authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Descriptive experience in one person with refractory chronic GVHD; not evidence of treatment efficacy.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 27867488 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.191366

Publisher access

Free full article on PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PubMed metadata and complete PubMed Central article; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10