Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Protection by Inhaled Hydrogen Therapy in a Rat Model of Acute Lung Injury Can Be Tracked in Vivo Using Molecular Imaging

Audi SH, Jacobs ER, Zhang X, Camara AKS, Zhao M, Medhora M, Rizzo B, Clough AV. · Shock. 2017;48(4):467-476.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2017Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to room air, 98% O₂ plus 2% N₂, or 98% O₂ plus 2% H₂.

Intervention and dose

Continuous chamber exposure to 98% O₂ plus 2% H₂ for 24, 48 or 60 hours. · The chamber measured >1.8% H₂ and >96% O₂. The article does not report total chamber gas flow, so H₂ and O₂ mL/min cannot be calculated.

Duration

Continuous 24-, 48- or 60-hour exposure, with outcome-specific assessments and imaging.

Reported result

H₂ reduced several imaging, oxidative, inflammatory and pleural-effusion changes and partially protected mitochondrial recovery. It did not improve body-weight change at 24 or 60 hours, did not significantly reduce lung wet-weight/body-weight rise, produced a higher 24-hour wet/dry ratio than hyperoxia alone, and did not change 4-HNE; results differed from some prior rat studies.

Main limitation

Preclinical hyperoxia model with continuous near-pure-oxygen exposure unlike many clinical contexts, outcome-specific subsets, numerous comparisons, no reported total gas flow and some findings inconsistent with earlier studies. NIH, VA and foundation support was reported; no explicit author conflict statement was identified, so absence is not inferred.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled time-course hyperoxia experiment with blinded histology and in-vivo molecular imaging subsets

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to room air, 98% O₂ plus 2% N₂, or 98% O₂ plus 2% H₂.

Sample

181 rats overall: normoxia n=42, hyperoxia n=77 and hyperoxia plus H₂ n=62. Different histology, biochemical and imaging outcomes used prespecified random subsets.

Duration

Continuous 24-, 48- or 60-hour exposure, with outcome-specific assessments and imaging.

Intervention

Continuous chamber exposure to 98% O₂ plus 2% H₂ for 24, 48 or 60 hours.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled premixed H₂/O₂ gas — not Brown's gas: the source mixture was 2% H₂ and 98% O₂, not the 2:1 H₂:O₂ ratio.

Dose or H₂ specification

The chamber measured >1.8% H₂ and >96% O₂. The article does not report total chamber gas flow, so H₂ and O₂ mL/min cannot be calculated.

H₂ flow

Not reported — no total mixture flow or H₂ mL/min is provided.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Nominal 98% O₂ (measured >96%), but O₂ mL/min is not reportable without total gas flow.

Comparator

Room-air normoxia and 98% O₂ plus 2% N₂ hyperoxia groups at matching exposure times.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Body/lung weights, edema and pleural effusion, histology, lavage protein/cells, oxidative markers, mitochondrial membrane recovery, glutathione, and SPECT HMPAO/duramycin uptake.

Reported result

H₂ reduced several imaging, oxidative, inflammatory and pleural-effusion changes and partially protected mitochondrial recovery. It did not improve body-weight change at 24 or 60 hours, did not significantly reduce lung wet-weight/body-weight rise, produced a higher 24-hour wet/dry ratio than hyperoxia alone, and did not change 4-HNE; results differed from some prior rat studies.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC author manuscript was checked for all exposure groups and totals, gas composition/measurements, time points, imaging and tissue outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and available disclosure section.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical hyperoxia model with continuous near-pure-oxygen exposure unlike many clinical contexts, outcome-specific subsets, numerous comparisons, no reported total gas flow and some findings inconsistent with earlier studies. NIH, VA and foundation support was reported; no explicit author conflict statement was identified, so absence is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Hyperoxia-induced lung injury in adult male rats; it does not establish inhaled H₂ treatment for human ALI/ARDS.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28915216 · DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000872

Publisher access

Free full author manuscript in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC author manuscript and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.