Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen-rich saline attenuates brain injury induced by cardiopulmonary bypass and inhibits microvascular endothelial cell apoptosis via the PI3K/Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway in rats

Chen K et al. · Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;43(4):1634–1647.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2017Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Sprague-Dawley rats after experimental cardiopulmonary bypass and cultured rat cerebral microvascular endothelial cells

Intervention and dose

Hydrogen-rich saline 1, 4 or 6 mL/kg after cardiopulmonary bypass; 6 mL/kg was used in subsequent experiments · 0.8 mmol/L dissolved H₂; dose response at 1, 4 and 6 mL/kg. Administration route is not clearly stated in the extracted article text.

Duration

Principal animal outcomes at 24 hours after bypass

Reported result

The article reports the largest protection at 6 mL/kg, with lower injury, permeability, inflammation and apoptosis measures; pathway-inhibitor experiments were used to probe mechanism.

Main limitation

Preclinical bypass model with several doses and extensive pathway work; the article’s direction of some Akt/GSK3β findings requires cautious interpretation.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Rat cardiopulmonary-bypass dose experiment with cerebral-microvascular-endothelial-cell mechanistic work

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Sprague-Dawley rats after experimental cardiopulmonary bypass and cultured rat cerebral microvascular endothelial cells

Sample

Animal and cell group sizes are not stated as a single total in the accessible article sections

Duration

Principal animal outcomes at 24 hours after bypass

Intervention

Hydrogen-rich saline 1, 4 or 6 mL/kg after cardiopulmonary bypass; 6 mL/kg was used in subsequent experiments

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas and not inhalation.

Dose or H₂ specification

0.8 mmol/L dissolved H₂; dose response at 1, 4 and 6 mL/kg. Administration route is not clearly stated in the extracted article text.

Comparator

Sham and bypass controls, plus PI3K-pathway-inhibitor comparisons in cells

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Neurological score, histology, blood-brain-barrier permeability, inflammatory and brain-injury markers, apoptosis and PI3K/Akt/GSK3β signaling

Reported result

The article reports the largest protection at 6 mL/kg, with lower injury, permeability, inflammation and apoptosis measures; pathway-inhibitor experiments were used to probe mechanism.

Extraction completeness

Open publisher article checked for preparation, concentration, dose response, timing and principal outcomes; total allocation and route remain unresolved.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical bypass model with several doses and extensive pathway work; the article’s direction of some Akt/GSK3β findings requires cautious interpretation.

Applies directly to

Cardiopulmonary-bypass brain injury in rats and hypoxic endothelial cells, not cardiac-surgery outcomes in people.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 29040978 · DOI: 10.1159/000484024

Publisher access

Free full text is available at the publisher.

Extraction basis

Free publisher full text and PubMed record; no retraction or expression of concern was shown in the checked records on 7 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.