Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen-water ameliorates radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity via MyD88’s effects on the gut microbiota

Xiao HW, Li Y, Luo D, Dong JL, Zhou LX, Zhao SY, Zheng QS, Wang HC, Cui M, Fan SJ. · Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2018;50(1):e433.

PreclinicalH₂-rich waterPublished 2018
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled mouse total-abdominal-irradiation study with survival, tissue, microRNA and microbiome experiments

Research topic

Gastrointestinal health

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male C57BL/6 mice exposed to 12 or 15 Gy total abdominal gamma irradiation; separate 3T3-cell mechanistic assays tested miR-1968-5p/MyD88.

Sample

Principal survival, weight and tissue comparisons used n=12 per group; fecal/microbiome analyses used n=4 per group, and a separate stool-output experiment housed six mice per cage.

Duration

Twice daily from day −2 through day +7; outcome timing varied from five-day microbiome/tissue measures to longer survival/alopecia observations.

Intervention

Fresh H₂-rich water 0.2 mL by oral gavage twice daily from two days before through seven days after irradiation.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in drinking water — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

H₂ specification

H₂ gas was bubbled into 500 mL sterile water at 150 mL/min for 20 minutes, targeting 0.8 mM. Measured fresh water was approximately 0.7 mM and fell to 0.2 mM over eight hours.

H₂ flow

Not applicable to dosing — oral water. Preparation used an explicitly reported 150 mL/min H₂ feed.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the oral intervention.

Comparator

Irradiated mice gavaged with 0.2 mL normal water twice daily, plus nonirradiated controls in selected tissue and microbiome analyses.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Survival, body weight, stool output/diarrhea, villus integrity, oxidative and epithelial markers, white-cell count, miRNA/MyD88/TLR signaling and gut-microbiome diversity/composition.

Reported result

Survival, weight, gastrointestinal function, villus integrity and several molecular measures favored H₂-rich water. Peripheral white-cell count did not improve, and microbiome richness/diversity indices did not differ significantly, although community composition shifted.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, supplement-linked figures and experiment-specific samples were checked for preparation flow/concentration, dose and timing, survival, tissue and microbiome findings, explicit null outcomes, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Male-mouse high-dose irradiation model, multiple experiments with changing irradiation dose and sample size, many molecular/microbiome comparisons, limited follow-up and microbiome associations that do not prove mechanism. Chinese public/institutional and U.S. NIH grants funded the work; authors declared no conflict and named the commercial gas-generator manufacturer.

Applies directly to

Radiation gastrointestinal injury in mice; it does not establish supportive care during radiotherapy in people.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 29371696 · DOI: 10.1038/emm.2017.246

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10