Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Molecular hydrogen alleviates asphyxia-induced neuronal cyclooxygenase-2 expression in newborn pigs

Varga V, Németh J, Oláh O, Tóth-Szűki V, Kovács V, Remzső G, Domoki F. · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2018;39(8):1273-1283.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2018
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Pooled controlled histological analysis of two newborn-pig asphyxia experiments plus time controls

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Fifty-nine newborn male Large-White piglets, using stored brain material from prior mild and severe asphyxia studies and additional control groups.

Sample

59 piglets overall. Each 8-minute and 20-minute experiment used time-control, asphyxia and asphyxia-plus-H₂ groups of n=7 each; additional naive controls were n=5 and four-hour normoxic controls n=12. Some secondary stains used n=6-7 per group.

Duration

Four hours of H₂ immediately after asphyxia, then 20 hours of room air; brain assessment at 24 hours.

Intervention

After 8 or 20 minutes of experimental asphyxia, piglets inhaled room air containing 2.1% H₂ for four hours, followed by ordinary room air for the remaining 20-hour survival period.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled H₂ added to room air — not Brown's gas and not a co-generated H₂/O₂ mixture.

H₂ specification

2.1% H₂ in room air. Total mixture flow, H₂ mL/min and O₂ mL/min were not reported in this article or reconstructable from the stated protocol.

H₂ flow

Not reported — total chamber/ventilator flow and H₂ mL/min are absent.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Room air was the carrier; O₂ flow in mL/min was not reported and is not inferred.

Comparator

Matching normoxic time controls and asphyxia groups without H₂ for each severity model, plus naive and shorter-duration normoxic controls.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Region-specific neuronal COX-2 immunopositivity, histopathology, neuronal 8-OHdG oxidative damage and microglial ramification.

Reported result

Twenty-minute asphyxia increased neuronal COX-2 in selected cortex/CA3 regions and H₂ groups were similar to controls; H₂ was also associated with lower oxidative and microglial changes in selected analyses. Eight-minute asphyxia produced no significant COX-2 change, and several regions after severe asphyxia showed only non-significant trends or no change. This re-analysis did not test survival or neurodevelopment.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article was checked for the source cohorts, allocations, asphyxia protocols, H₂ composition/timing, region-specific positive and null findings, funding and available declarations.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Secondary analysis of tissue from earlier experiments, small region-specific groups, many histological comparisons, male piglets only, no long-term functional endpoint and no reported gas flow. Hungarian/EU public grants funded the study; no explicit conflict declaration was identified, so absence is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Experimental asphyxia in newborn piglets; it does not establish neonatal clinical efficacy or an inhalation protocol.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 29565041 · DOI: 10.1038/aps.2017.148

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10