Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen-rich solution attenuates myocardial injury caused by cardiopulmonary bypass in rats via the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway

Chen K, Sun Y, Diao Y, Zhang T, Dong W. · Oncology Letters. 2018;16(1):167–178.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2018
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized three-group rat cardiopulmonary-bypass experiment plus neonatal-rat cardiomyocyte hypoxia/reoxygenation experiments

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats undergoing thoracotomy or 60-minute cardiopulmonary bypass, plus cultured neonatal-rat cardiomyocytes.

Sample

30 adult rats randomized to sham, bypass or bypass plus H₂-rich solution, n=10 per group; neonatal cardiomyocytes were obtained from offspring, but one consolidated cell-experiment replicate count was not reported.

Duration

Injection three days before bypass; 60-minute bypass and in-vivo collection at 24 hours; cell hypoxia for two hours followed by four hours of reoxygenation.

Intervention

One intraperitoneal injection of H₂-rich physiological solution, 6 mL/kg, three days before bypass; cultured cardiomyocytes received H₂-rich solution around hypoxia/reoxygenation and JAK2-siRNA manipulations.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in physiological solution — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

H₂ specification

Dose was 6 mL/kg. The article says the solution was prepared by pressurization according to a previous report but does not state its numeric H₂ concentration or preparation flow.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — injected/culture solution, not gas inhalation; preparation flow was not reported.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the H₂ intervention.

Comparator

Sham thoracotomy and bypass without H₂-rich solution; cell controls included hypoxia/reoxygenation, control siRNA and JAK2 siRNA groups.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Myocardial histology/fibrosis, cytokines, cTnI, hFABP, SOD, MDA, MPO, apoptosis/cell viability and JAK2/STAT3-related proteins.

Reported result

Histology and all prespecified serum injury, inflammatory and oxidative markers favored H₂ solution versus bypass alone; cell viability/apoptosis and pathway markers also changed in the reported protective direction. JAK2 knockdown alone did not significantly change several cell outcomes and attenuated multiple H₂-associated effects.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, figures and methods were checked for allocation, route/dose, missing concentration/flow, in-vivo and cell findings including null comparisons, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Preclinical prophylactic timing, small male-rat groups, unreported H₂ concentration, broad mechanistic outcome set and incomplete cell-replicate reporting. Chinese national, Liaoning and university grants funded the work; authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Rat bypass injury and cultured cardiomyocytes; it does not establish perioperative benefit or dosing in people.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 29928398 · DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8639

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10