Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen-rich solution attenuates myocardial injury caused by cardiopulmonary bypass in rats via the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway

Chen K, Sun Y, Diao Y, Zhang T, Dong W. · Oncology Letters. 2018;16(1):167–178.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2018Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats undergoing thoracotomy or 60-minute cardiopulmonary bypass, plus cultured neonatal-rat cardiomyocytes.

Intervention and dose

One intraperitoneal injection of H₂-rich physiological solution, 6 mL/kg, three days before bypass; cultured cardiomyocytes received H₂-rich solution around hypoxia/reoxygenation and JAK2-siRNA manipulations. · Dose was 6 mL/kg. The article says the solution was prepared by pressurization according to a previous report but does not state its numeric H₂ concentration or preparation flow.

Duration

Injection three days before bypass; 60-minute bypass and in-vivo collection at 24 hours; cell hypoxia for two hours followed by four hours of reoxygenation.

Reported result

Histology and all prespecified serum injury, inflammatory and oxidative markers favored H₂ solution versus bypass alone; cell viability/apoptosis and pathway markers also changed in the reported protective direction. JAK2 knockdown alone did not significantly change several cell outcomes and attenuated multiple H₂-associated effects.

Main limitation

Preclinical prophylactic timing, small male-rat groups, unreported H₂ concentration, broad mechanistic outcome set and incomplete cell-replicate reporting. Chinese national, Liaoning and university grants funded the work; authors declared no competing interests.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized three-group rat cardiopulmonary-bypass experiment plus neonatal-rat cardiomyocyte hypoxia/reoxygenation experiments

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats undergoing thoracotomy or 60-minute cardiopulmonary bypass, plus cultured neonatal-rat cardiomyocytes.

Sample

30 adult rats randomized to sham, bypass or bypass plus H₂-rich solution, n=10 per group; neonatal cardiomyocytes were obtained from offspring, but one consolidated cell-experiment replicate count was not reported.

Duration

Injection three days before bypass; 60-minute bypass and in-vivo collection at 24 hours; cell hypoxia for two hours followed by four hours of reoxygenation.

Intervention

One intraperitoneal injection of H₂-rich physiological solution, 6 mL/kg, three days before bypass; cultured cardiomyocytes received H₂-rich solution around hypoxia/reoxygenation and JAK2-siRNA manipulations.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in physiological solution — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

Dose or H₂ specification

Dose was 6 mL/kg. The article says the solution was prepared by pressurization according to a previous report but does not state its numeric H₂ concentration or preparation flow.

Comparator

Sham thoracotomy and bypass without H₂-rich solution; cell controls included hypoxia/reoxygenation, control siRNA and JAK2 siRNA groups.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Myocardial histology/fibrosis, cytokines, cTnI, hFABP, SOD, MDA, MPO, apoptosis/cell viability and JAK2/STAT3-related proteins.

Reported result

Histology and all prespecified serum injury, inflammatory and oxidative markers favored H₂ solution versus bypass alone; cell viability/apoptosis and pathway markers also changed in the reported protective direction. JAK2 knockdown alone did not significantly change several cell outcomes and attenuated multiple H₂-associated effects.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, figures and methods were checked for allocation, route/dose, missing concentration/flow, in-vivo and cell findings including null comparisons, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical prophylactic timing, small male-rat groups, unreported H₂ concentration, broad mechanistic outcome set and incomplete cell-replicate reporting. Chinese national, Liaoning and university grants funded the work; authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Rat bypass injury and cultured cardiomyocytes; it does not establish perioperative benefit or dosing in people.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 29928398 · DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8639

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.