Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen gas inhalation protects against cigarette smoke-induced COPD development in mice

Lu W, Li D, Hu J, Mei H, Shu J, Long Z, Yuan L, Li D, Guan R, Li Y, Xu J, Wang T, Yao H, Zhong N, Zheng Z. · Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018;10(6):3232–3243.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2018
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized cigarette-smoke mouse experiment with complementary human bronchial-epithelial-cell assays

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male C57BL/6J mice exposed to cigarette smoke for 90 days and cultured 16HBE human bronchial epithelial cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide.

Sample

Main in-vivo groups were normal-air control n=10, cigarette smoke n=8 and cigarette smoke plus H₂ n=8; histology used n=5/group, signaling assays n=4/group and cell assays n=3–5/group.

Duration

One hour per session, twice daily with a 6–8 hour interval, during the final 30 days of a 90-day cigarette-smoke protocol; assessment on day 91.

Intervention

After 60 days of cigarette-smoke exposure, mice inhaled the final H₂/O₂/N₂ mixture for one hour twice daily, with a 6–8 hour interval, through day 90.

Hydrogen form

Diluted Brown's gas / oxyhydrogen — co-generated 66.7% H₂/33.3% O₂ was diluted with nitrogen before delivery.

H₂ specification

The delivered mixture contained 42% H₂, 21% O₂ and 37% N₂ at a reported total flow of 3.8 L/min.

H₂ flow

1,596 mL/min H₂, calculated from the reported 3,800 mL/min total flow × 42% H₂.

O₂ delivered with H₂

21% O₂; 798 mL/min O₂, calculated from 3,800 mL/min × 21%. The remaining 1,406 mL/min was N₂.

Comparator

Cigarette-smoke mice without H₂ and normal-air controls; matched H₂O₂-treated cell controls were used in vitro.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Forced lung-function measures, hematocrit, emphysema, collagen deposition, airway goblet cells, bronchoalveolar inflammatory cells and cytokines, mucins, ERK1/2 and NF-κB signaling and cell-culture cytokines.

Reported result

H₂ exposure was associated with less emphysema, airway remodeling, inflammation and mucus and favorable changes in several lung-function and signaling outcomes. Forced vital capacity and resistance index did not differ significantly between smoke-only and H₂ groups. The experiment tested prevention/development in mice, not treatment of established human COPD.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete open-access publisher/PMC article, randomization, assay-specific sizes, gas generation, final composition and flow, schedule, positive and null results, funding and conflict statement were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Preclinical prevention model with small assay-specific groups, high-concentration chamber exposure, numerous outcomes and no adverse-event assessment. Component flows are calculations from the chamber mixture, not direct inspired dose per mouse. Multiple Chinese public grants funded the work; authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Applies directly to

Cigarette-smoke-induced COPD-like changes in mice and oxidative-stress assays in cells; it does not establish efficacy or safety in people with COPD.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 30069319 · DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.93

Publisher access

Open-access publisher article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Complete Journal of Thoracic Disease/PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10