Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen gas inhalation protects against cigarette smoke-induced COPD development in mice

Lu W, Li D, Hu J, Mei H, Shu J, Long Z, Yuan L, Li D, Guan R, Li Y, Xu J, Wang T, Yao H, Zhong N, Zheng Z. · Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018;10(6):3232–3243.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2018Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Male C57BL/6J mice exposed to cigarette smoke for 90 days and cultured 16HBE human bronchial epithelial cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide.

Intervention and dose

After 60 days of cigarette-smoke exposure, mice inhaled the final H₂/O₂/N₂ mixture for one hour twice daily, with a 6–8 hour interval, through day 90. · The delivered mixture contained 42% H₂, 21% O₂ and 37% N₂ at a reported total flow of 3.8 L/min.

Duration

One hour per session, twice daily with a 6–8 hour interval, during the final 30 days of a 90-day cigarette-smoke protocol; assessment on day 91.

Reported result

H₂ exposure was associated with less emphysema, airway remodeling, inflammation and mucus and favorable changes in several lung-function and signaling outcomes. Forced vital capacity and resistance index did not differ significantly between smoke-only and H₂ groups. The experiment tested prevention/development in mice, not treatment of established human COPD.

Main limitation

Preclinical prevention model with small assay-specific groups, high-concentration chamber exposure, numerous outcomes and no adverse-event assessment. Component flows are calculations from the chamber mixture, not direct inspired dose per mouse. Multiple Chinese public grants funded the work; authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized cigarette-smoke mouse experiment with complementary human bronchial-epithelial-cell assays

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Male C57BL/6J mice exposed to cigarette smoke for 90 days and cultured 16HBE human bronchial epithelial cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide.

Sample

Main in-vivo groups were normal-air control n=10, cigarette smoke n=8 and cigarette smoke plus H₂ n=8; histology used n=5/group, signaling assays n=4/group and cell assays n=3–5/group.

Duration

One hour per session, twice daily with a 6–8 hour interval, during the final 30 days of a 90-day cigarette-smoke protocol; assessment on day 91.

Intervention

After 60 days of cigarette-smoke exposure, mice inhaled the final H₂/O₂/N₂ mixture for one hour twice daily, with a 6–8 hour interval, through day 90.

Hydrogen form

Diluted Brown's gas / oxyhydrogen — co-generated 66.7% H₂/33.3% O₂ was diluted with nitrogen before delivery.

Dose or H₂ specification

The delivered mixture contained 42% H₂, 21% O₂ and 37% N₂ at a reported total flow of 3.8 L/min.

H₂ flow

1,596 mL/min H₂, calculated from the reported 3,800 mL/min total flow × 42% H₂.

O₂ delivered with H₂

21% O₂; 798 mL/min O₂, calculated from 3,800 mL/min × 21%. The remaining 1,406 mL/min was N₂.

Comparator

Cigarette-smoke mice without H₂ and normal-air controls; matched H₂O₂-treated cell controls were used in vitro.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Forced lung-function measures, hematocrit, emphysema, collagen deposition, airway goblet cells, bronchoalveolar inflammatory cells and cytokines, mucins, ERK1/2 and NF-κB signaling and cell-culture cytokines.

Reported result

H₂ exposure was associated with less emphysema, airway remodeling, inflammation and mucus and favorable changes in several lung-function and signaling outcomes. Forced vital capacity and resistance index did not differ significantly between smoke-only and H₂ groups. The experiment tested prevention/development in mice, not treatment of established human COPD.

Extraction completeness

The complete open-access publisher/PMC article, randomization, assay-specific sizes, gas generation, final composition and flow, schedule, positive and null results, funding and conflict statement were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical prevention model with small assay-specific groups, high-concentration chamber exposure, numerous outcomes and no adverse-event assessment. Component flows are calculations from the chamber mixture, not direct inspired dose per mouse. Multiple Chinese public grants funded the work; authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Applies directly to

Cigarette-smoke-induced COPD-like changes in mice and oxidative-stress assays in cells; it does not establish efficacy or safety in people with COPD.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 30069319 · DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.93

Publisher access

Open-access publisher article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Complete Journal of Thoracic Disease/PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.