Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Effects of the long-term consumption of hydrogen-rich water on the antioxidant activity and the gut flora in female juvenile soccer players from Suzhou, China

Sha JB, Zhang SS, Lu YM, Gong WJ, Jiang XP, Wang JJ, Qiao TL, Zhang HH, Zhao MQ, Wang DP, Xia H, Li ZW, Chen JL, Zhang L, Zhang CG. · Medical Gas Research. 2018;8(4):135–143.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2018
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Randomized, open-label, two-group exploratory study

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Healthy juvenile female football players at the Suzhou Sports School in China, without current sports injury and without reported nutritional-supplement or antibiotic use during the preceding three months.

Sample

38 athletes: hydrogen-rich-water group n=28 and ordinary-water control n=10.

Duration

Eight weeks, with measurements at baseline, four weeks and eight weeks.

Intervention

For two months, the intervention group replaced its usual drinking water with hydrogen-rich water in an amount described only as equivalent to each athlete's previous daily water consumption.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in drinking water — H₂ only, not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

The complete article does not report a measured dissolved-H₂ concentration or a standardized daily water volume, so neither concentration nor ingested H₂ dose can be calculated.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — drinking water, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

Ten athletes continued ordinary water in amounts consistent with their previous habits.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, creatine kinase, malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase, total antioxidant capacity, IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and stool 16S-rDNA measures of gut-microbiota composition, richness and diversity.

Reported result

The article reports between-group differences over time for hemoglobin, malondialdehyde, total antioxidant capacity, IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α. Creatine kinase (p=0.061) and blood urea nitrogen (p=0.887) were not significant. At eight weeks, the reported microbiota richness/diversity comparisons were also not significant (sobs p=0.479, ace p=0.710, chao p=0.369 and Shannon p=0.369), despite favorable wording in the discussion.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free article, allocation, water description, laboratory and microbiota results, positive and null findings, ethics information and article disclosures were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Small, highly unequal groups, no placebo or reported blinding, no standardized or measured H₂ dose, many outcomes and baseline differences in training history and microbiota. Several microbiota comparisons were explicitly non-significant. Adverse events were not systematically reported. No dedicated funding or conflict-of-interest declaration was identified in the article text, so absence of funding or conflicts is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Exploratory biomarker and microbiota findings in juvenile female athletes; not evidence of improved sports performance or a clinical treatment effect.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 30713665 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.248263

Publisher access

Open-access PubMed Central article.

Extraction basis

Complete PubMed Central article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10