Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Perioperatively inhaled hydrogen gas diminishes neurologic injury following experimental circulatory arrest in swine

Cole AR et al. · JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4(2):176–187.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2019
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized neonatal-swine cardiopulmonary-bypass and circulatory-arrest experiment

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Neonatal swine undergoing 75 minutes of circulatory arrest at 25°C

Sample

16 swine, n=8/group

Duration

24 hours of ventilation including perioperative treatment; follow-up through postoperative day 3

Intervention

2.4% H₂ added to inspiratory gases during and after the ischemic insult through a conventional ventilator

Hydrogen form

H₂ added to ventilator inspiratory gas — not Brown’s gas.

H₂ specification

2.4% inhaled H₂.

H₂ flow

Not reported as a fixed mL/min value — ventilator flow varied with the mechanical-ventilation protocol.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Ventilator oxygen concentration was managed clinically; no single fixed O₂ flow in mL/min represents the exposure.

Comparator

The same perioperative protocol without added H₂

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Survival, neurologic examinations, MRI, histopathology, serologic brain-injury markers and renal injury

Reported result

The article reports less neurological and renal injury with H₂. Overall survival was not significantly different; two control swine died before day-3 assessment.

Results-extraction completeness

Allocation, concentration, timing, clinical, imaging and histologic outcomes, safety procedures, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Large-animal preclinical model, small sample, two control deaths and a complex ventilator exposure that cannot be reduced to one fixed mL/min dose.

Applies directly to

Experimental pediatric-like circulatory arrest in swine, not cardiac-surgery outcomes in children or adults.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 31061920 · DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.11.006

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the journal.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC/journal full text and PubMed record; no retraction or expression of concern was shown in the checked records on 7 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10