Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Molecular hydrogen suppresses glioblastoma growth via inducing the glioma stem-like cell differentiation

Liu MY et al. · Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:145.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2019Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Rat orthotopic C6 glioma, mouse U87 xenograft and C6/U87 cell models

Intervention and dose

Animals inhaled Brown’s gas / oxyhydrogen in a closed box for 1 hour twice daily; cells received hydrogen-rich medium · 66.666% H₂ + 33.333% O₂ by volume; article reports rounded 67%/33%. Cell medium contained 0.55–0.65 mM dissolved H₂.

Duration

From day 2 after model establishment to experiment end; exact duration varies by assay

Reported result

In the reported animal models, the mixed gas was associated with smaller tumors and longer survival. In cell assays, hydrogen-rich medium was associated with changes in differentiation/stemness markers and reduced sphere formation, migration, invasion and colony formation.

Main limitation

Preclinical only; high-concentration flammable oxyhydrogen mixture, unreported gas flow and animal group sizes, cell lines and animal tumor models. No human participants or clinical outcomes.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Cell-culture and animal study

Research topic

Brain tumors — glioma and glioblastoma

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Rat orthotopic C6 glioma, mouse U87 xenograft and C6/U87 cell models

Sample

Animal group counts are not reported in the full article text; cell assays report triplicate independent experiments where specified

Duration

From day 2 after model establishment to experiment end; exact duration varies by assay

Intervention

Animals inhaled Brown’s gas / oxyhydrogen in a closed box for 1 hour twice daily; cells received hydrogen-rich medium

Hydrogen form

Brown’s gas / oxyhydrogen — H₂ and O₂ co-delivered, not H₂ alone.

Dose or H₂ specification

66.666% H₂ + 33.333% O₂ by volume; article reports rounded 67%/33%. Cell medium contained 0.55–0.65 mM dissolved H₂.

H₂ flow

Not reported — cannot be calculated because the total mixed-gas flow is absent from the full article.

O₂ delivered with H₂

33.333% O₂ by volume; O₂ flow not reported. The paper’s separate 2,000 mL/min O₂ value applies to MRI anesthesia, not the hydrogen intervention.

Comparator

Control animals and cell-culture conditions

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Tumor volume, survival and cell differentiation, stemness, migration, invasion and colony formation

Reported result

In the reported animal models, the mixed gas was associated with smaller tumors and longer survival. In cell assays, hydrogen-rich medium was associated with changes in differentiation/stemness markers and reduced sphere formation, migration, invasion and colony formation.

Extraction completeness

The complete open-access article was checked for intervention composition, methods, principal positive and null results, funding and conflicts. Animal group sizes and total gas flow are not reported in the article.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical only; high-concentration flammable oxyhydrogen mixture, unreported gas flow and animal group sizes, cell lines and animal tumor models. No human participants or clinical outcomes.

Applies directly to

The reported laboratory and animal models only. It does not establish a treatment for people with glioblastoma.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE risk-of-bias framework · animal tumor-growth and survival results

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Serious concerns / largely unclear — preliminary

Appraisal rationale

Random assignment is stated without sequence details; animal group sizes, allocation concealment, housing randomization and blinding are incompletely reported. Blinded evaluation is specified for some histology, not all outcomes.

Appraisal domains

Unclear — random assignment stated, but sequence generation, baseline balance and concealment are not fully reported. · Unclear/high concern — housing, caregiver blinding and exposure handling are not described in enough detail. · Unclear — animal group counts and complete flow through each analysis are not reported in the extracted methods. · Mixed — blinded investigators are reported for histology, but blinding is unclear for tumor volume, survival and other assays. · Some concerns — no registered protocol identified and numerous animal/cell outcomes were reported.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 31113492 · DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1241-x

Publisher access

Open-access publisher and PMC full texts are available.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC full text, publisher article and PubMed bibliographic record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.