Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen inhalation protects hypoxic–ischemic brain damage by attenuating inflammation and apoptosis in neonatal rats

Wu G, Chen Z, Wang P, Zhao M, Fujino M, Zhang C, Zhou W, Hirano SI, Li XK, Zhao L. · Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2019;244(12):1017-1027.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2019
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized seven-group neonatal-rat duration and delayed-start experiment

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

One hundred forty male and female postnatal-day-7 Sprague-Dawley rats in a carotid-ligation plus hypoxia model.

Sample

140 rats: naive n=22, sham n=22, HIBD n=22, immediate H₂ for 30 minutes n=22, 60 minutes n=22, 90 minutes n=22, and delayed-start 90-minute H₂ n=8. Twelve per principal group were assigned to pathology/molecular work and ten to neurobehavioral testing.

Duration

Acute assessments at 24 and 72 hours; Morris water-maze testing on postnatal days 43-47.

Intervention

After hypoxic-ischemic injury, pups inhaled 3% H₂ in 97% air for 30, 60 or 90 minutes; a separate group began 90-minute treatment two hours late. The methods state exposure occurred twice daily before the acute sacrifices.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled H₂ mixed with air — H₂ alone was added; this was not Brown's gas or a co-generated H₂/O₂ mixture.

H₂ specification

3% H₂ and 97% air. The article does not report total gas flow, chamber turnover, H₂ flow in mL/min or O₂ flow in mL/min; those values cannot be reconstructed reliably.

H₂ flow

Not reported — neither total mixture flow nor H₂ mL/min is stated.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Air was the carrier. O₂ percentage and O₂ mL/min were not separately reported; no value is inferred.

Comparator

Naive, sham-surgery and untreated hypoxic-ischemic groups, plus comparisons among exposure durations and immediate versus two-hour delayed start.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Infarct volume, Nissl injury, microglial activation, inflammatory and apoptotic markers, TUNEL/NeuN, and adolescent spatial learning/memory.

Reported result

Longer H₂ exposures were generally associated with smaller infarcts, less inflammation/apoptosis and better later maze performance, and immediate treatment outperformed the two-hour delay. The 30-minute exposure did not significantly reduce cortical Iba1 versus HIBD (p=0.055), and H₂ did not shorten first-day maze escape latency (p>0.05). Naive and sham groups did not differ on several acute assays.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article was checked for all seven groups, sex counts, gas composition, timing, delayed-start arm, acute and long-term outcomes, null results, stated limitations, funding and conflict declaration.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Neonatal-rat model with no standard-treatment comparison, multiple molecular endpoints, incomplete gas-delivery engineering data, and limited examination of sex effects and other brain immune cells. Chinese institutional/provincial grants funded the work; authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in rats; it does not establish neonatal clinical efficacy, safety or a human inhalation protocol.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 31189349 · DOI: 10.1177/1535370219855399

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10