Languages

Read Hydrogenology in your language

Automatic translation noticeHydrogenology was originally written in English. The name Hydrogenology is a proper name and is never translated. Other language versions are translated automatically with AI and may contain inaccuracies, especially in scientific or medical terminology. When precision matters, consult the English version and the linked original source.

Selecting a language opens an automatic Google translation of the current page. You can also use your browser's built-in translation option; in Chrome, use the Translate icon in the address bar or right-click the page and choose Translate. Google Chrome translation help ↗

Europe

Widely spoken languages

Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen Rich Water Improved Ventilatory, Perceptual and Lactate Responses to Exercise

Botek M, Krejčí J, McKune AJ, Sládečková B, Naumovski N. · Int J Sports Med. 2019;40(14):879–885.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2019Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

In twelve healthy men, hydrogen water before cycling reduced lactate at harder stages and slightly lowered breathing and effort ratings at the hardest stage. Heart rate and oxygen use were unchanged; actual sporting performance was not tested.

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthy nonsmoking male sports-science participants; age 27.1 ± 4.9 years, mass 77.3 ± 7.6 kg, baseline VO₂max 51.1 ± 6.1 mL/kg/min.

Intervention and dose

600 mL fresh hydrogen water: 300 mL thirty minutes and 300 mL one minute before cycling. TIENS Hyper-H Health Cup electrolytic generator, same bottled source water, 22°C. · 0.5 ppm H₂ by H₂ Blue reagent; reported 150 µmol total (approximately 0.30 mg), 1.96 ± 0.19 µmol/kg; pH 7.4, ORP −400 mV.

Duration

One acute dose per condition, one-week washout; fixed 34-minute cycling protocol: ten minutes at 1 W/kg, then eight minutes each at 2, 3 and 4 W/kg.

Reported result

Lactate at 3 W/kg: 4.0 ± 1.6 versus 5.1 ± 1.9 mmol/L, P = 0.007; at 4 W/kg: 8.9 ± 2.2 versus 10.6 ± 3.0, P = 0.006. At 4 W/kg, ventilation P = 0.011, VE/VO₂ 32.3 ± 7.2 versus 35.0 ± 8.4 (P = 0.009), RPE 17.8 ± 1.2 versus 18.5 ± 0.8 (P = 0.012). These meet the authors’ 0.05/3 threshold. Heart rate, VO₂ and respiratory quotient were unchanged at every intensity; all P > 0.109 at 4 W/kg. Other measures at 3 W/kg all P > 0.339; all measures at 2 W/kg P > 0.458. Body mass between visits P = 0.528.

Main limitation

Twelve young men, acute fixed-workload protocol, many correlated endpoints; correction covered three intensities per measure, not every outcome family. pH/ORP also differed. The RPE difference was below one point. No race performance, time-to-exhaustion, treatment-related VO₂max gain or clinical benefit was demonstrated; optimal dose/timing and oxidative mechanisms were not established.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover; initial six per sequence by drawing coloured lots; one-week washout.

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy nonsmoking male sports-science participants; age 27.1 ± 4.9 years, mass 77.3 ± 7.6 kg, baseline VO₂max 51.1 ± 6.1 mL/kg/min.

Sample

Twelve men, all in paired analyses; no attrition reported.

Duration

One acute dose per condition, one-week washout; fixed 34-minute cycling protocol: ten minutes at 1 W/kg, then eight minutes each at 2, 3 and 4 W/kg.

Intervention

600 mL fresh hydrogen water: 300 mL thirty minutes and 300 mL one minute before cycling. TIENS Hyper-H Health Cup electrolytic generator, same bottled source water, 22°C.

Hydrogen form

Hydrogen-rich water

Dose or H₂ specification

0.5 ppm H₂ by H₂ Blue reagent; reported 150 µmol total (approximately 0.30 mg), 1.96 ± 0.19 µmol/kg; pH 7.4, ORP −400 mV.

Comparator

600 mL unprocessed bottled water, zero H₂, pH 7.2, ORP +270 mV, 22°C; participants and researchers blinded until analysis completed.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Last-minute cardiorespiratory measurements, lactate and Borg RPE at fixed workloads. Baseline VO₂max characterizes the participants, not a treatment-related gain.

Reported result

Lactate at 3 W/kg: 4.0 ± 1.6 versus 5.1 ± 1.9 mmol/L, P = 0.007; at 4 W/kg: 8.9 ± 2.2 versus 10.6 ± 3.0, P = 0.006. At 4 W/kg, ventilation P = 0.011, VE/VO₂ 32.3 ± 7.2 versus 35.0 ± 8.4 (P = 0.009), RPE 17.8 ± 1.2 versus 18.5 ± 0.8 (P = 0.012). These meet the authors’ 0.05/3 threshold. Heart rate, VO₂ and respiratory quotient were unchanged at every intensity; all P > 0.109 at 4 W/kg. Other measures at 3 W/kg all P > 0.339; all measures at 2 W/kg P > 0.458. Body mass between visits P = 0.528.

Extraction completeness

Main-text methods, results, limitations and declarations were reviewed. Source versions, missing information and conflicting findings are stated in this record.

Reported adverse events

No side effects during/after hydrogen water reported; a small acute physiological study cannot establish general safety.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Twelve young men, acute fixed-workload protocol, many correlated endpoints; correction covered three intensities per measure, not every outcome family. pH/ORP also differed. The RPE difference was below one point. No race performance, time-to-exhaustion, treatment-related VO₂max gain or clinical benefit was demonstrated; optimal dose/timing and oxidative mechanisms were not established.

Applies directly to

Limited to the population/model and protocol described above. These findings do not provide a treatment, concentration or device recommendation.

Funding and support

Partial Palacký University Olomouc grant IGA_FTK_2019_002; partial results presented at Nutrition Society Australia, Canberra 2018.

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare no conflicts.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 31574544 · DOI: 10.1055/a-0991-0268

Publisher access

Complete seven-page typeset online-first article, with 2019;00:00–00 header and University of Georgia watermark, hosted by Fisiología del Ejercicio. Final issue citation: 40(14), 879–885.

Editorial verification

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. No independent clinical or statistical assessment has been performed.

Source sections checked

All seven online-first pages: Methods; Tables 1–2; Figures 1–2; Results; Discussion/limitations; Acknowledgments and Conflict of Interest.

Extraction basis

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. Complete seven-page typeset online-first article, with 2019;00:00–00 header and University of Georgia watermark, hosted by Fisiología del Ejercicio. Final issue citation: 40(14), 879–885.

Registry / related-source limitations

Ethics Palacký University 75/2017; no trial-registration identifier reported.

Last reviewed

29 October 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 692 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.