Languages

Read Hydrogenology in your language

Automatic translation noticeHydrogenology was originally written in English. The name Hydrogenology is a proper name and is never translated. Other language versions are translated automatically with AI and may contain inaccuracies, especially in scientific or medical terminology. When precision matters, consult the English version and the linked original source.

Selecting a language opens an automatic Google translation of the current page. You can also use your browser's built-in translation option; in Chrome, use the Translate icon in the address bar or right-click the page and choose Translate. Google Chrome translation help ↗

Europe

Widely spoken languages

Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Acute ingestion of hydrogen-rich water does not improve incremental treadmill running performance in endurance-trained athletes

Ooi CH, Ng SK, Omar EA. · Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme. 2020;45(5):513–519.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Fourteen trained male runners tested hydrogen-rich water and plain water on separate days. With two 290 mL doses before exercise, they ran for almost the same time: 618 seconds versus 619 seconds. Oxygen use and other measured exercise responses were also similar. This small study tested short-term use only.

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

14 endurance-trained male runners/triathletes, mean age 34 ± 4 years, mass 63.1 ± 7.2 kg, height 1.72 ± 0.05 m.

Intervention and dose

Two 290 mL doses (total 580 mL) of hydrogen-rich water in one test session; each consumed within 1–2 minutes, 5–10 minutes before submaximal running and before the subsequent maximal incremental test. · Measured dissolved hydrogen: 1.02 ± 0.05 ppm. Two 290 mL doses (580 mL total) were consumed around the exercise tests.

Duration

Single-session exposure on each of two experimental visits, separated by at least 7 days; two prior familiarization visits.

Reported result

Time to exhaustion 618 ± 126 s with H2-water versus 619 ± 113 s placebo; no statistically significant difference. VO₂ max 56.9 ± 4.4 versus 57.1 ± 4.7 mL/kg/min; running economy 197 ± 12 versus 198 ± 12 mL/kg/km; maximal heart rate 184 ± 7 in both conditions. Lactate threshold, perceived exertion and blood lactate/glucose/bicarbonate/pH responses also did not differ significantly.

Main limitation

Small male trained-athlete sample. Acute dosing only; no inference about chronic use or other populations. Hydrogen uptake in participants not measured. Endogenous H2 production not controlled. Some biochemical samples unavailable.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover; four laboratory visits at least 7 days apart, first two familiarization, last two experimental conditions.

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

14 endurance-trained male runners/triathletes, mean age 34 ± 4 years, mass 63.1 ± 7.2 kg, height 1.72 ± 0.05 m.

Sample

14 randomized crossover participants and 14 analyzed for exercise outcomes; 13 for blood-gas/submaximal biochemical outcomes and 12 for post-exercise serum lactate because of sampling constraints.

Duration

Single-session exposure on each of two experimental visits, separated by at least 7 days; two prior familiarization visits.

Intervention

Two 290 mL doses (total 580 mL) of hydrogen-rich water in one test session; each consumed within 1–2 minutes, 5–10 minutes before submaximal running and before the subsequent maximal incremental test.

Hydrogen form

Molecular hydrogen dissolved in drinking water.

Dose or H₂ specification

Measured dissolved hydrogen: 1.02 ± 0.05 ppm. Two 290 mL doses (580 mL total) were consumed around the exercise tests.

Comparator

Same volumes/timing of distilled water without electrolysis; hydrogen not detected. Independent investigator prepared drinks; participants and outcome staff blinded, and participants could not distinguish drinks.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Exercise performance/time to exhaustion, alongside prespecified physiological exercise responses; no prospectively registered hierarchy identified.

Reported result

Time to exhaustion 618 ± 126 s with H2-water versus 619 ± 113 s placebo; no statistically significant difference. VO₂ max 56.9 ± 4.4 versus 57.1 ± 4.7 mL/kg/min; running economy 197 ± 12 versus 198 ± 12 mL/kg/km; maximal heart rate 184 ± 7 in both conditions. Lactate threshold, perceived exertion and blood lactate/glucose/bicarbonate/pH responses also did not differ significantly.

Extraction completeness

The available main full text was reviewed for methods, results, limitations and declarations. Remaining source-specific uncertainties are stated in this record.

Reported adverse events

All 14 participants reported no side effects after H2-water. Questionnaire included headache, diarrhea, stomach upset and vomiting; single-session observation cannot establish long-term safety.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small male trained-athlete sample. Acute dosing only; no inference about chronic use or other populations. Hydrogen uptake in participants not measured. Endogenous H2 production not controlled. Some biochemical samples unavailable.

Applies directly to

14 endurance-trained male runners/triathletes, mean age 34 ± 4 years, mass 63.1 ± 7.2 kg, height 1.72 ± 0.05 m. Findings apply only to the studied design and exposure; no treatment or device recommendation.

Funding and support

Industry-sponsored grant PRO-S-1031-U721 from Sterling Circle Sdn Bhd to C.H.O. and S.K.N. Authors state that the sponsor had no role in design, data collection or analysis, publication decision or manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 31675478 · DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2019-0553

Publisher access

Complete author manuscript, revision R2 dated 21 October 2019, in the University of Toronto TSpace/Scholaris repository; cover plus 28 manuscript pages, marked Draft; not the publisher-typeset version.

Editorial verification

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. The source version and access limitations are stated in this record. No independent clinical or statistical assessment has been performed.

Source sections checked

Entire 29-page PDF Methods: PDF pp 7–12 Results: PDF pp 12–13 Discussion and limitations: PDF pp 13–19 Funding/conflicts: PDF p 20 Table 1: PDF p 24 (also visually verified) Figure captions and figures: PDF pp 25–29

Extraction basis

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. Complete author manuscript, revision R2 dated 21 October 2019, in the University of Toronto TSpace/Scholaris repository; cover plus 28 manuscript pages, marked Draft; not the publisher-typeset version.

Registry / related-source limitations

Trial registration not reported. Ethics approval USM/JEPeM/15100446. Distinct from catalogued treadmill study PMID 36538554 and cold-water/heat study PMID 40731803.

Last reviewed

29 October 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 692 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.