Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Inhalation of molecular hydrogen increases breath acetone excretion during submaximal exercise: a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Hori A et al. · Med Gas Res. 2020;10(3):96–102.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthy young men

Intervention and dose

Participants breathed the test gas from a 200-L Douglas bag through a demand valve and mask. The exercise experiment used 1% H₂ from 10 minutes before cycling through 20 minutes of cycling at 60% peak oxygen uptake; the rest experiment used 35 minutes of inhalation. · 1% H₂, 21% O₂, 0% CO₂ and nitrogen balance.

Duration

Approximately 30 minutes of exposure in the exercise experiment and 35 minutes in the seated-rest experiment; crossover sessions

Reported result

During exercise, the H₂ condition produced a larger rise in breath acetone and a small increase in oxygen uptake. Oxidative-stress and antioxidant measures did not differ. During seated rest, breath acetone and oxygen uptake did not differ.

Main limitation

Very small male-only physiological study, single blinding and short exposure. Breath acetone is an indirect metabolic measure, not a clinical or performance outcome. Authors reported no conflicts and no funding.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized single-blind placebo-controlled crossover study with separate exercise and seated-rest experiments

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy young men

Sample

Exercise experiment: 10 participants; seated-rest experiment: 6 participants

Duration

Approximately 30 minutes of exposure in the exercise experiment and 35 minutes in the seated-rest experiment; crossover sessions

Intervention

Participants breathed the test gas from a 200-L Douglas bag through a demand valve and mask. The exercise experiment used 1% H₂ from 10 minutes before cycling through 20 minutes of cycling at 60% peak oxygen uptake; the rest experiment used 35 minutes of inhalation.

Hydrogen form

H₂ diluted in air — H₂ was the active added gas, not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

1% H₂, 21% O₂, 0% CO₂ and nitrogen balance.

H₂ flow

No fixed H₂ flow in mL/min was reported. Gas was inhaled on demand from a Douglas bag, so inspired flow varied with each participant’s ventilation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

21% O₂ in both the H₂ mixture and control gas; no supplemental O₂ was added.

Comparator

Artificial air with 21% O₂, 0% CO₂ and nitrogen balance, without H₂

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Breath acetone, oxygen uptake, respiratory and circulatory variables, oxidative stress and antioxidant activity

Reported result

During exercise, the H₂ condition produced a larger rise in breath acetone and a small increase in oxygen uptake. Oxidative-stress and antioxidant measures did not differ. During seated rest, breath acetone and oxygen uptake did not differ.

Extraction completeness

Gas composition, delivery method, methods, principal results, funding and conflict statement checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Very small male-only physiological study, single blinding and short exposure. Breath acetone is an indirect metabolic measure, not a clinical or performance outcome. Authors reported no conflicts and no funding.

Applies directly to

Healthy young men performing the study’s submaximal cycling protocol; not patients or competitive-performance settings.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 33004705 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.296038

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC full text and PubMed bibliographic record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.