Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Effects of electrolyzed hydrogen water ingestion during endurance exercise in a heated environment on body fluid balance and exercise performance

Ito H, Kabayama S, Goto K. · Temperature. 2020;7(3):290–299.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Twelve trained triathletes, mean age 20.0 years, exercising in heat.

Intervention and dose

During 60 minutes of cycling at 65% of VO₂max in 32°C and 50% relative humidity, participants drank 2.0 mL/kg electrolyzed hydrogen water every 15 minutes, followed by an incremental test to exhaustion. · The article reports pH 9.7±0.2 for intervention water but does not report a measured numerical dissolved-H₂ concentration; the average consumed volume was 926±13 mL.

Duration

Two exercise trials at least three days apart; 60 minutes fixed-load cycling plus a post-rest incremental test.

Reported result

Body mass fell by about 1.1 kg in both conditions. Plasma volume, osmolality, sodium, potassium, pH, lactate, bicarbonate, temperature changes and time to exhaustion did not differ between waters. Energy expenditure during fixed-load cycling was slightly lower with electrolyzed water (13.2 versus 13.7 kcal/min, p=0.04), without improved exercise performance.

Main limitation

Only 12 young trained athletes, acute crossover exposure, multiple physiological endpoints and no measured dissolved-H₂ concentration. The significant energy-expenditure difference was small and did not translate to time-to-exhaustion benefit. The work was funded by Nihon Trim Co., maker of the generator, and one author was a company employee involved in generator preparation and pH checking.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized crossover exercise trial

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Twelve trained triathletes, mean age 20.0 years, exercising in heat.

Sample

12 participants; all performed both water conditions.

Duration

Two exercise trials at least three days apart; 60 minutes fixed-load cycling plus a post-rest incremental test.

Intervention

During 60 minutes of cycling at 65% of VO₂max in 32°C and 50% relative humidity, participants drank 2.0 mL/kg electrolyzed hydrogen water every 15 minutes, followed by an incremental test to exhaustion.

Hydrogen form

H₂ in alkaline electrolyzed drinking water — H₂ only, not Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

The article reports pH 9.7±0.2 for intervention water but does not report a measured numerical dissolved-H₂ concentration; the average consumed volume was 926±13 mL.

Comparator

Purified water made with the same generator, pH 7.4±0.1.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Body mass, plasma volume, serum osmolality, electrolytes, acid-base and lactate measures, skin and muscle temperature, energy expenditure and time to exhaustion.

Reported result

Body mass fell by about 1.1 kg in both conditions. Plasma volume, osmolality, sodium, potassium, pH, lactate, bicarbonate, temperature changes and time to exhaustion did not differ between waters. Energy expenditure during fixed-load cycling was slightly lower with electrolyzed water (13.2 versus 13.7 kcal/min, p=0.04), without improved exercise performance.

Extraction completeness

The complete PubMed Central article, randomization, water preparation, volumes, environmental protocol, primary null findings, funding and conflict disclosure were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Only 12 young trained athletes, acute crossover exposure, multiple physiological endpoints and no measured dissolved-H₂ concentration. The significant energy-expenditure difference was small and did not translate to time-to-exhaustion benefit. The work was funded by Nihon Trim Co., maker of the generator, and one author was a company employee involved in generator preparation and pH checking.

Applies directly to

Acute hydration during endurance exercise in heat among trained young triathletes; no demonstrated performance or hydration benefit.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 33117861 · DOI: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1742056

Publisher access

Free full article on PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PubMed metadata and complete PubMed Central article; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.