Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Two-week continuous supplementation of hydrogen-rich water increases peak oxygen uptake during an incremental cycling exercise test in healthy humans: a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Hori A et al. · Med Gas Res. 2020;10(4):163–169.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthy university students able to complete an incremental cycling test

Intervention and dose

Acute experiment: 500 mL once, 30 minutes before cycling. Two-week experiment: 500 mL on each weekday for 10 doses (5 L total), with the final dose 30 minutes before testing. · Dissolved H₂: 4.3 ± 0.9 ppm in the acute experiment and 5.9 ± 0.2 ppm in the 2-week experiment.

Duration

Single-dose crossover sessions at least 24 hours apart; separate 2-week parallel experiment

Reported result

The single dose did not significantly change peak oxygen uptake or peak load. After 2 weeks, the H₂-water group had a greater increase in weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake than placebo; peak-load change showed only a statistical trend. Lactate and measured redox responses did not differ.

Main limitation

Small pilot experiments, single blinding, different designs for acute and 2-week questions, and no direct measurement of maximal oxygen uptake. Two authors were MiZ employees and the company supplied a resource.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Two experiments: randomized single-blind crossover acute test and randomized single-blind parallel 2-week test

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy university students able to complete an incremental cycling test

Sample

Acute experiment: 9 participants (6 men, 3 women); 2-week experiment: 20 men (10 H₂ water, 10 placebo)

Duration

Single-dose crossover sessions at least 24 hours apart; separate 2-week parallel experiment

Intervention

Acute experiment: 500 mL once, 30 minutes before cycling. Two-week experiment: 500 mL on each weekday for 10 doses (5 L total), with the final dose 30 minutes before testing.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

Dissolved H₂: 4.3 ± 0.9 ppm in the acute experiment and 5.9 ± 0.2 ppm in the 2-week experiment.

Comparator

Placebo water prepared with the same handling procedure

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Peak oxygen uptake, peak cycling load, respiratory and circulatory variables, perceived exertion, lactate, oxidative stress and antioxidant activity

Reported result

The single dose did not significantly change peak oxygen uptake or peak load. After 2 weeks, the H₂-water group had a greater increase in weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake than placebo; peak-load change showed only a statistical trend. Lactate and measured redox responses did not differ.

Extraction completeness

Methods, result tables, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small pilot experiments, single blinding, different designs for acute and 2-week questions, and no direct measurement of maximal oxygen uptake. Two authors were MiZ employees and the company supplied a resource.

Applies directly to

Healthy young university students completing the reported incremental cycling protocol.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 33380582 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.304223

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC full text and PubMed bibliographic record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.