Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

In vivo microelectrode monitoring of real-time hydrogen concentration in different tissues of rats after inhaling hydrogen gas

Liu BY, Xue JL, Gu QQ, Zhao M, Zhang MY, Wang MY, Wang Y, Qin SC. · Medical Gas Research. 2022;12(3):107–112.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2022
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

In-vivo rat tissue pharmacokinetic experiment across three inhaled H₂ concentrations

Research topic

Other molecular hydrogen research

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Fifty anesthetized eight-week-old male Sprague–Dawley rats with microelectrodes placed approximately 1 mm into one of seven exposed tissues.

Sample

Fifty rats overall; equilibrium/dynamic measurements used three to six rats per tissue.

Duration

Continuous exposure until equilibrium and then air washout; time varied by tissue and concentration rather than following a fixed treatment duration.

Intervention

Continuous hood administration of 4%, 42% or 67% H₂ until tissue equilibrium, followed by air until return to baseline.

Hydrogen form

Cylinder H₂ deliberately mixed with air and separately adjusted O₂ to keep O₂ near 21% — not Brown's gas. Even the 67% H₂ condition was approximately 67% H₂/21% O₂/remainder carrier gas, not the 2:1 electrolytic H₂/O₂ mixture.

H₂ specification

Total hood flow was 3 L/min. Target H₂ concentrations were detector-confirmed and O₂ was held at approximately 21%.

H₂ flow

Calculated from the reported total flow: 120 mL/min at 4%, 1,260 mL/min at 42% and 2,010 mL/min at 67% H₂.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Approximately 630 mL/min O₂ at each concentration, calculated from 3,000 mL/min × ~21%; exact O₂ percentage varied around the stated target.

Comparator

Within-experiment comparisons across H₂ concentrations and tissues, with air baseline/washout; there was no disease or therapeutic-outcome control.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Real-time equilibrium H₂ concentration plus 50%/90% saturation and desaturation times in brain, liver, spleen, kidney, thigh muscle and visceral/subcutaneous white adipose tissue.

Reported result

Tissue H₂ increased dose-dependently. Mean equilibrium concentration was highest in brain and lowest in thigh muscle; liver/spleen/kidney generally equilibrated faster than muscle/adipose tissues, and higher concentrations took longer to approach 90% saturation and to wash out. This was a distribution study and measured no therapeutic efficacy endpoint.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, device/methods, figures and disclosures were checked for exact mixture construction, total and calculated component flows, tissue samples, pharmacokinetic findings, limitations, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Anesthetized rats, surgically exposed tissue, shallow single-location microelectrode readings, only one tissue per rat and no efficacy or safety endpoint. Anesthesia can alter tissue blood flow. Chinese public/institutional grants funded the work; authors declared no conflict.

Applies directly to

Rat tissue distribution under anesthesia; it informs exposure design but does not establish a therapeutic dose or effect in humans.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 34854421 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.330694

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10