Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Development of a novel porcine ischemia/reperfusion model inducing different ischemia times in bilateral kidneys-effects of hydrogen gas inhalation

Kinoshita Y, Shirakawa K, Sano M, Yokoo T, Kume H, Kobayashi E. · Translational andrology and urology. 2022;11(4):430-438.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2022Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

pigs, cell used to study kidney and urinary health.

Intervention and dose

Full text reports inhaled H₂-containing gas. Detected intervention quantities or schedules: 100%, 250 mL/min, 5%, 3.0 L/min, 3%, 10 min, 30 min, 8.3%, 9.9%. · H₂-related quantities reported in the intervention passages: 100%, 250 mL/min, 5%, 3.0 L/min, 3%, 10 min, 30 min, 8.3%, 9.9%. Values are not combined across different experimental arms.

Duration

250 mL/min

Reported result

Article-reported result excerpt (24 words maximum): “The mean increase in plasma DNA levels released from the kidneys by IRI (difference between post-IRI renal vein level and pre-IRI inferior vena cava…” This excerpt is not a complete result summary; consult the linked full text for all positive and null findings.

Main limitation

Preclinical evidence only; findings do not establish a treatment effect in people. Funding or grant information is reported in the full article. The article declares no conflicts of interest.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled preclinical study

Research topic

Kidney and urinary health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

pigs, cell used to study kidney and urinary health.

Sample

Preclinical study; group or assay counts reported in the full text include n=2.

Duration

250 mL/min

Intervention

Full text reports inhaled H₂-containing gas. Detected intervention quantities or schedules: 100%, 250 mL/min, 5%, 3.0 L/min, 3%, 10 min, 30 min, 8.3%, 9.9%.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled molecular H₂; not classified as Brown’s gas without an H₂/O₂ composition.

Dose or H₂ specification

H₂-related quantities reported in the intervention passages: 100%, 250 mL/min, 5%, 3.0 L/min, 3%, 10 min, 30 min, 8.3%, 9.9%. Values are not combined across different experimental arms.

H₂ flow

Not reported in the full article — an absolute H₂ flow in mL/min could not be verified.

O₂ delivered with H₂

O₂ concentration and absolute O₂ flow were not both reported in the full article; no value is inferred.

Comparator

Control or comparison condition reported in the full article; see the linked methods for arm-specific details.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

survival or mortality, clinical symptoms or functional scores, oxidative-stress and antioxidant markers, apoptosis or cell injury, histology or tissue damage, cardiovascular measures

Reported result

Article-reported result excerpt (24 words maximum): “The mean increase in plasma DNA levels released from the kidneys by IRI (difference between post-IRI renal vein level and pre-IRI inferior vena cava…” This excerpt is not a complete result summary; consult the linked full text for all positive and null findings.

Extraction completeness

The complete machine-readable article was checked for source identity, methods, intervention quantities, results, tables, funding and conflict declarations. This public record is based on the full article.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical evidence only; findings do not establish a treatment effect in people. Funding or grant information is reported in the full article. The article declares no conflicts of interest.

Applies directly to

Applies to the reported animal, cell or tissue model, not directly to patients.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 35558259 · DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-1164

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official Europe PMC JATS full article and PubMed/PMC identifiers; structured full-text extraction and validation completed 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.