Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Effects of pre-exercise H_2 inhalation on physical fatigue and related prefrontal cortex activation during and after high-intensity exercise

Hong Y, Dong G, Li Q, Wang V, Liu M, Jiang G, Bao D, Zhou J. · Frontiers in physiology. 2022;13:988028.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2022Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Human participants studied for exercise and recovery; age 18–35 years. See eligibility criteria in the linked full text.

Intervention and dose

Full text reports inhaled H₂-containing gas. Detected intervention quantities or schedules: 20 min, 2 min, 21.57%, 4.08%, 1800 ml/min, 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%. · H₂-related quantities reported in the intervention passages: 20 min, 2 min, 21.57%, 4.08%, 1800 ml/min, 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%. Values are not combined across different experimental arms.

Duration

20 min

Reported result

Article-reported result excerpt (24 words maximum): “No significant differences in RPE, HR and fNIRS outcomes at baseline were observed between PLAC and H_2 gas inhalation ( p > 0.131), but…” This excerpt is not a complete result summary; consult the linked full text for all positive and null findings.

Main limitation

Human evidence; design, sample size and comparator limit interpretation. Funding or grant information is reported in the full article. The full article contains a conflict, commercial-support or supplied-product declaration; consult the source wording.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Human interventional or observational study

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Human participants studied for exercise and recovery; age 18–35 years. See eligibility criteria in the linked full text.

Sample

Human study; the full text reports 24 participants, with group/assay counts including n=24.

Duration

20 min

Intervention

Full text reports inhaled H₂-containing gas. Detected intervention quantities or schedules: 20 min, 2 min, 21.57%, 4.08%, 1800 ml/min, 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled molecular H₂; not classified as Brown’s gas without an H₂/O₂ composition.

Dose or H₂ specification

H₂-related quantities reported in the intervention passages: 20 min, 2 min, 21.57%, 4.08%, 1800 ml/min, 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%. Values are not combined across different experimental arms.

H₂ flow

Not reported in the full article — an absolute H₂ flow in mL/min could not be verified.

O₂ delivered with H₂

O₂ concentration and absolute O₂ flow were not both reported in the full article; no value is inferred.

Comparator

Placebo or matched control reported in the full article.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

clinical symptoms or functional scores, oxidative-stress and antioxidant markers, apoptosis or cell injury, neurological or behavioral measures, cardiovascular measures, respiratory measures

Reported result

Article-reported result excerpt (24 words maximum): “No significant differences in RPE, HR and fNIRS outcomes at baseline were observed between PLAC and H_2 gas inhalation ( p > 0.131), but…” This excerpt is not a complete result summary; consult the linked full text for all positive and null findings.

Extraction completeness

The complete machine-readable article was checked for source identity, methods, intervention quantities, results, tables, funding and conflict declarations. This public record is based on the full article.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Human evidence; design, sample size and comparator limit interpretation. Funding or grant information is reported in the full article. The full article contains a conflict, commercial-support or supplied-product declaration; consult the source wording.

Applies directly to

Applies only to the population and protocol reported in this exercise and recovery article.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 36117685 · DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.988028

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official Europe PMC JATS full article and PubMed/PMC identifiers; structured full-text extraction and validation completed 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.