Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Efficacy of inhaled hydrogen on neurological outcome following brain ischaemia during post-cardiac arrest care (HYBRID II)

Tamura T et al.; HYBRID II Study Group · EClinicalMedicine. 2023;58:101907.

HumanOther formsPublished 2023Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Comatose adults aged 20–80 after cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Intervention and dose

2% H₂ added to supplementary oxygen through mechanical ventilation · 2% H₂ with clinically adjusted inspired O₂ reported in the protocol as 24–50%.

Duration

18 hours after admission; outcomes assessed through 90 days

Reported result

The primary outcome was not statistically significant: CPC 1–2 occurred in 56% with H₂ and 39% with control (p=0.15). Several secondary mRS and survival results favored H₂, but the trial was stopped early and was underpowered.

Main limitation

Stopped early because of pandemic enrollment restrictions, with 73 of 360 planned participants. The prespecified primary endpoint was null; positive secondary findings require cautious interpretation. Taiyo Nippon Sanso funded the trial.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Comatose adults aged 20–80 after cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Sample

73 randomized: H₂ n=39; control n=34

Duration

18 hours after admission; outcomes assessed through 90 days

Intervention

2% H₂ added to supplementary oxygen through mechanical ventilation

Hydrogen form

H₂ added to ventilator gas with supplemental O₂ — not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

2% H₂ with clinically adjusted inspired O₂ reported in the protocol as 24–50%.

Comparator

Supplementary oxygen without H₂ using blinded gas cylinders

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Primary: CPC 1–2 at 90 days. Secondary: modified Rankin scale, survival and safety

Reported result

The primary outcome was not statistically significant: CPC 1–2 occurred in 56% with H₂ and 39% with control (p=0.15). Several secondary mRS and survival results favored H₂, but the trial was stopped early and was underpowered.

Extraction completeness

Full methods, outcomes, registration, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Stopped early because of pandemic enrollment restrictions, with 73 of 360 planned participants. The prespecified primary endpoint was null; positive secondary findings require cautious interpretation. Taiyo Nippon Sanso funded the trial.

Applies directly to

Selected comatose adults after cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving intensive post-arrest care.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 36969346 · DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101907

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.