Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Effects of Hydrogen Gas Inhalation on Community-Dwelling Adults of Various Ages: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Prospective Clinical Trial

Rahman MH et al. · Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(6):1241.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2023Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Community-dwelling adults aged 40–70 years without diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease

Intervention and dose

2% H₂ in filtered air through a nasal cannula for 30 minutes daily · 2% H₂ + 98% filtered air.

Duration

30 minutes daily for 4 weeks

Reported result

Several blood biomarkers changed from baseline, while white-cell counts did not. The design cannot establish whether H₂ caused the changes or whether they represent clinical cognitive benefit.

Main limitation

Uncontrolled before-and-after study with numerous biomarkers, no diagnosed Alzheimer’s population and no basis for inferring clinical efficacy. The device company assisted the study.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Single-arm open-label prospective clinical trial

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Community-dwelling adults aged 40–70 years without diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease

Sample

54 screened and enrolled; 51 described in the analyzed cohort

Duration

30 minutes daily for 4 weeks

Intervention

2% H₂ in filtered air through a nasal cannula for 30 minutes daily

Hydrogen form

H₂ diluted in filtered ambient air — not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

2% H₂ + 98% filtered air.

H₂ flow

Not reported — device output and total gas flow were not stated, so absolute H₂ flow cannot be calculated.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No supplemental O₂ was reported; O₂ from filtered ambient air was present, but its absolute flow cannot be calculated.

Comparator

No control group

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

White-cell counts, oxidative-stress markers and multiple blood biomarkers associated with cognitive or neurodegenerative research

Reported result

Several blood biomarkers changed from baseline, while white-cell counts did not. The design cannot establish whether H₂ caused the changes or whether they represent clinical cognitive benefit.

Extraction completeness

Intervention, full methods, results, registry and funding statements checked in the open-access full text; gas flow remains unreported.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Uncontrolled before-and-after study with numerous biomarkers, no diagnosed Alzheimer’s population and no basis for inferring clinical efficacy. The device company assisted the study.

Applies directly to

Community-dwelling adults aged 40–70 under this short biomarker protocol; not patients with confirmed Alzheimer’s disease.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 37371971 · DOI: 10.3390/antiox12061241

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.