Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Conflicting findings on the effectiveness of hydrogen therapy for ameliorating vascular leakage in a 5-day post hypoxic-ischemic survival piglet model

Htun Y, Nakamura S, Nakao Y, Mitsuie T, Ohta K, Arioka M, Yokota T, Inoue E, Inoue K, Tsuchiya T, Koyano K, Konishi Y, Miki T, Ueno M, Kusaka T. · Scientific Reports. 2023;13:10486.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2023
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized four-group newborn-piglet hypoxic-ischemic survival experiment

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Newborn piglets exposed to a controlled hypoxic-ischemic insult and followed for five days.

Sample

33 piglets were randomized; 26 met the prespecified insult-duration analysis range: normothermia n=7, H₂ n=7, therapeutic hypothermia n=6 and H₂ plus hypothermia n=6.

Duration

Twenty-four hours of H₂ ventilation; neurological recovery was observed for five days and brains were assessed on day five.

Intervention

After resuscitation, H₂ ventilation was given for 24 hours, either with normothermia or with whole-body therapeutic hypothermia at 33.5±0.5°C.

Hydrogen form

H₂ alone diluted in nitrogen and clinical oxygen — not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

A cylinder containing 3.8% H₂/96.2% N₂ was blended with 100% O₂. Delivered H₂ varied from 2.1% to 2.7% as each piglet's FiO₂ was adjusted from 0.21 to 0.40.

H₂ flow

Not reported — the article gives H₂ concentration and ventilator duration but not total ventilation flow, so mL/min cannot be calculated.

O₂ delivered with H₂

FiO₂ was adjusted from 21% to 40%; O₂ flow in mL/min was not reported.

Comparator

Normothermia without H₂ and therapeutic hypothermia without H₂, creating four randomized groups.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Albumin immunohistochemistry as a marker of cerebral vascular leakage, neurological scores, physiological and blood-gas variables, cerebral blood volume and cerebral hemoglobin oxygenation.

Reported result

The prespecified albumin-leakage outcome was numerically lower with H₂ alone but did not differ significantly among the four groups. Neurological and physiological measures produced mixed secondary findings; the article therefore explicitly reports conflicting rather than uniformly positive evidence.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete open-access publisher article, exclusions, group sizes, gas preparation, positive and null outcomes, funding, sponsor role and conflict statement were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Preclinical piglet model, only 26 analyzed animals, seven post-randomization exclusions based on insult duration, four small groups and a histological surrogate primary outcome. H₂ concentration varied with oxygen requirement and total gas flow was not reported. Japanese JSPS KAKENHI grants funded the study; sponsors reportedly had no study role and the authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Newborn-piglet hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy model; the null vascular-leakage result does not establish benefit in human newborns.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 37380745 · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37577-0

Publisher access

Open-access Scientific Reports article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Scientific Reports publisher article, PubMed Central copy and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10