Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Efficacy of donepezil plus hydrogen–oxygen mixture inhalation for treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease: A retrospective study

Dan Z, Li H, Xie J. · Medicine. 2023;102(30):e34382.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2023
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Single-hospital retrospective comparative study

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

273 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease treated between March 2018 and March 2022.

Sample

273 records: donepezil plus H₂/O₂ n=138 and donepezil alone n=135.

Duration

Four weeks of treatment with three-month video/telephone or outpatient follow-up described; per-session inhalation duration was not stated.

Intervention

Donepezil 5 mg daily plus H₂/O₂ inhalation once daily, six days each week for four weeks.

Hydrogen form

Brown's gas / oxyhydrogen generated as 66.67% H₂ and 33.33% O₂.

H₂ specification

Generator output was 3 L/min; direct calculation gives approximately 2,000 mL/min H₂ and 1,000 mL/min O₂. Duration of each daily inhalation session was not reported.

H₂ flow

Approximately 2,000 mL/min.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Approximately 1,000 mL/min.

Comparator

Donepezil 5 mg daily without H₂/O₂; treatment was not randomized.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

MMSE, MoCA, ADAS-Cog, activities of daily living and P300 event-related-potential latency/amplitude.

Reported result

Four-week cognitive, daily-living and P300 comparisons favored the combined-treatment group. Both groups improved on several measures. Baseline scale scores did not differ significantly. The report did not establish whether improvements persisted at the described three-month follow-up.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article and tables were checked for retrospective allocation, exact generator output/composition, missing session duration, all cognitive and P300 outcomes, follow-up description, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Retrospective nonrandomized co-intervention study with no H₂-only arm, possible selection/confounding and treatment-adherence bias, scale-led outcomes, unreported inhalation-session duration and unclear three-month outcome reporting. Hospital support funded the study; authors declared no conflicts and the commercial generator was identified but no material-support statement was provided.

Applies directly to

Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease treated with donepezil in one hospital; it does not establish independent H₂ efficacy or disease modification.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 37505148 · DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034382

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10