Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

The efficacy of hydrogen/oxygen therapy favored the recovery of omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant infection: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

Shi MM, Chen YT, Wang XD, et al. · Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition. 2023;73(3):228–233.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2023Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Adults aged 18–80 hospitalized with common-type Omicron COVID-19 at seven hospitals in Shanghai.

Intervention and dose

A mixed H₂/O₂ gas was delivered by nasal cannula at 3 L/min for at least 7 hours/day in addition to standard care. · Total mixed-gas flow 3 L/min. The article identifies an AMS-H-03 generator but does not print the H₂ or O₂ fraction.

Duration

At least 7 hours/day during hospitalization; viral conversion was followed through day 10.

Reported result

Viral shedding averaged 3.3±2.30 versus 4.1±3.12 days (p=0.374); 5-day conversion was 87.5% versus 75%, cumulative conversion p=0.283, and CT resolution p=0.711. Between-arm IL-6 differences were not significant. One fever in the H₂/O₂ arm was judged unrelated; no serious treatment-related event was reported.

Main limitation

Small trial with significant baseline sex and height imbalance, unequal co-treatments, uncertainty about the start of viral positivity and several favorable narrative claims despite null between-arm tests. The device was supplied by Shanghai Asclepius Meditec; public grants were reported and the authors declared no conflict.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Multicenter randomized active-controlled parallel trial

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adults aged 18–80 hospitalized with common-type Omicron COVID-19 at seven hospitals in Shanghai.

Sample

64 randomized: H₂/O₂ n=32 and oxygen n=32.

Duration

At least 7 hours/day during hospitalization; viral conversion was followed through day 10.

Intervention

A mixed H₂/O₂ gas was delivered by nasal cannula at 3 L/min for at least 7 hours/day in addition to standard care.

Hydrogen form

H₂ and O₂ were co-delivered; the article does not state the mixture ratio, so Hydrogenology does not label it Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

Total mixed-gas flow 3 L/min. The article identifies an AMS-H-03 generator but does not print the H₂ or O₂ fraction.

H₂ flow

Not reported — absolute H₂ flow cannot be calculated without a reported H₂ fraction.

O₂ delivered with H₂

O₂ was co-delivered, but its fraction and absolute flow were not reported.

Comparator

Oxygen inhalation plus standard care. Concomitant treatment was imbalanced: Paxlovid was used by 17 controls and 8 H₂/O₂ participants; Lianhua Qingwen by 11 and 5; antibiotics by 5 and 2.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Viral-shedding duration and conversion, inflammatory and lymphocyte measures, chest-CT resolution and adverse events.

Reported result

Viral shedding averaged 3.3±2.30 versus 4.1±3.12 days (p=0.374); 5-day conversion was 87.5% versus 75%, cumulative conversion p=0.283, and CT resolution p=0.711. Between-arm IL-6 differences were not significant. One fever in the H₂/O₂ arm was judged unrelated; no serious treatment-related event was reported.

Extraction completeness

The complete PMC and J-STAGE articles, methods, tables, supplementary outcomes, adverse events, funding and conflicts were checked; the principal between-arm findings were not statistically significant.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small trial with significant baseline sex and height imbalance, unequal co-treatments, uncertainty about the start of viral positivity and several favorable narrative claims despite null between-arm tests. The device was supplied by Shanghai Asclepius Meditec; public grants were reported and the authors declared no conflict.

Applies directly to

Hospitalized adults with common-type Omicron infection under this 2022 Shanghai protocol; it does not establish benefit for other variants, prevention or severe COVID-19.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 37970554 · DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.23-32

Publisher access

Free full articles on PMC and J-STAGE.

Extraction basis

PMC and J-STAGE full articles plus PubMed and trial metadata; full-text and article-status check completed 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.