Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

H₂ inhalation therapy in patients with moderate COVID-19 (H2COVID): a prospective ascending-dose phase I clinical trial

Salomez-Ihl C, Giai J, Barbado M, Paris A, Touati S, Alcaraz JP, Tanguy S, Leroy C, Lehmann A, Degano B, Gavard M, Bedouch P, Pavese P, Moreau-Gaudry A, Roustit M, Boucher F, Cinquin P, Brion JP. · Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024;68(8):e0057324.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2024Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Hospitalized adults with moderate COVID-19 receiving standard care.

Intervention and dose

3.6% H₂/96.4% N₂ at 1 L/min, combined with wall oxygen adjusted to clinical need. · 3.6% H₂ and 96.4% nitrogen at 1 L/min.

Duration

One, three or planned six days.

Reported result

The maximum tolerated duration was at least three days; two serious adverse events were attributed to COVID-19 rather than H₂, and the design cannot establish efficacy.

Main limitation

Very small, open-label, noncomparative phase I study. Gas cylinders and the delivery device were supplied by Air Products.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Prospective open-label single-ascending-duration phase I study

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Safety/tolerability signal; efficacy indeterminate.

Outcome type

Phase I safety and tolerability outcomes with exploratory clinical measures.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Hospitalized adults with moderate COVID-19 receiving standard care.

Sample

12 participants in one-, three- and planned six-day duration cohorts.

Duration

One, three or planned six days.

Intervention

3.6% H₂/96.4% N₂ at 1 L/min, combined with wall oxygen adjusted to clinical need.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled H₂-containing gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

3.6% H₂ and 96.4% nitrogen at 1 L/min.

H₂ flow

1 L/min H₂ mixture; wall oxygen up to 6 L/min as clinically needed.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Supplemental oxygen was adjusted independently according to clinical need.

Comparator

No concurrent control; ascending-duration cohorts.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Maximum tolerated duration, adverse events, oxygen needs and exploratory clinical and laboratory observations.

Reported result

The maximum tolerated duration was at least three days; two serious adverse events were attributed to COVID-19 rather than H₂, and the design cannot establish efficacy.

Extraction completeness

The full article methods, intervention, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflict statements were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Very small, open-label, noncomparative phase I study. Gas cylinders and the delivery device were supplied by Air Products.

Applies directly to

Hospitalized adults with moderate COVID-19 under this monitored protocol.

Preliminary appraisal framework

ROBINS-I — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Serious concerns

Appraisal rationale

Appropriate for early safety exploration, but nonrandom cohorts, no comparator, small numbers and changing duration prevent efficacy inference.

Appraisal domains

Selection and allocation checked · Confounding and co-interventions remain possible · Missing observations checked where reported · Outcome measurement varies by endpoint · Selective reporting cannot be excluded

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 39016593 · DOI: 10.1128/aac.00573-24

Publisher access

A free publisher or repository full article was checked.

Extraction basis

Publisher or repository full article and bibliographic record; checked 10 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.