Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen-Rich Gas Enhanced Sprint-Interval Performance: Metabolomic Insights into Underlying Mechanisms

Dong G, Liu H, Chen Y, Bao D, Xu W, Zhou J. · Nutrients. 2024;16(14):2341.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2024Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthy recreationally active adult men accustomed to regular resistance training.

Intervention and dose

Nasal-cannula inhalation for 60 minutes before a four-bout Wingate sprint-interval test. · Generator output 30 mL/s (1,800 mL/min total): 66.7% H₂ and 33.3% O₂. Because room air diluted the stream, the authors estimated at most 4.08% inspired H₂ and 21.66% inspired O₂; concentrations entering participants were not measured.

Duration

60 minutes before each test visit.

Reported result

Fourth-sprint mean power, fatigue index and time-to-peak favored HRG; fourth-sprint peak power was null (p=0.064). First-to-fourth attenuation favored HRG for mean/peak power and time-to-peak, while attenuation in fatigue index was null (p=0.820). Four selected metabolites and pathway analyses were exploratory; no adverse effects were reported.

Main limitation

Very small male-only crossover, multiple performance comparisons and exploratory metabolomics. The true inspired concentrations were estimated rather than measured, and only late-sprint outcomes improved. The authors reported no external funding and declared no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Double-blind counterbalanced randomized placebo-controlled crossover study

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy recreationally active adult men accustomed to regular resistance training.

Sample

10 men; mean age 23.6±2.2 years. All completed both visits.

Duration

60 minutes before each test visit.

Intervention

Nasal-cannula inhalation for 60 minutes before a four-bout Wingate sprint-interval test.

Hydrogen form

Brown's gas / oxyhydrogen — H₂ and O₂ co-delivered in a 2:1 ratio, not H₂ alone.

Dose or H₂ specification

Generator output 30 mL/s (1,800 mL/min total): 66.7% H₂ and 33.3% O₂. Because room air diluted the stream, the authors estimated at most 4.08% inspired H₂ and 21.66% inspired O₂; concentrations entering participants were not measured.

H₂ flow

Approximately 1,200 mL/min H₂, calculated from two-thirds of the reported 1,800 mL/min generator output.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Approximately 600 mL/min O₂ co-delivered, calculated from one-third of the generator output.

Comparator

Ambient air delivered through an identical nasal-cannula setup; visit order randomized with at least seven days washout.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Fourth-sprint and first-to-fourth attenuation in mean/peak power, fatigue index and time-to-peak, adverse effects and exploratory plasma metabolomics.

Reported result

Fourth-sprint mean power, fatigue index and time-to-peak favored HRG; fourth-sprint peak power was null (p=0.064). First-to-fourth attenuation favored HRG for mean/peak power and time-to-peak, while attenuation in fatigue index was null (p=0.820). Four selected metabolites and pathway analyses were exploratory; no adverse effects were reported.

Extraction completeness

The complete MDPI/PMC article, gas generator specification, calculated component flows, randomization, all sprint outcomes, metabolomics, adverse effects, funding and conflicts were checked; both null performance tests are explicit.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Very small male-only crossover, multiple performance comparisons and exploratory metabolomics. The true inspired concentrations were estimated rather than measured, and only late-sprint outcomes improved. The authors reported no external funding and declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Healthy active young men performing this laboratory sprint protocol; not evidence for long-term training adaptation or treatment of illness.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 39064785 · DOI: 10.3390/nu16142341

Publisher access

Open-access full article on MDPI and PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

MDPI and PMC full article plus PubMed metadata; full-text and article-status check completed 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.