Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Effects of hydrogen-rich water on blood uric acid in patients with hyperuricemia: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Wu F et al. · Heliyon. 2024;10(16):e36401.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2024
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Randomized placebo-controlled three-arm trial

Research topic

Metabolic and lipid health

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adults with hyperuricemia

Sample

100 completed: placebo n=32, low-dose n=35, high-dose n=33

Duration

8 weeks; assessments at weeks 4 and 8

Intervention

Low dose: two 330 mL H₂-water bottles plus one ordinary-water bottle daily. High dose: three 330 mL H₂-water bottles daily.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas.

H₂ specification

H₂ concentration at least 4.66 mg/L. The high-dose group received approximately 4.61 mg H₂/day.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — oral water, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

Three 330 mL bottles/day of ordinary drinking water

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Blood uric acid, dose and time response, safety

Reported result

Uric acid fell within the high-dose group from 488.2 to 446.8 μmol/L at week 8. However, the proportions achieving at least a 10% reduction did not differ significantly between placebo, low-dose and high-dose groups.

Results-extraction completeness

Methods, main results and trial registration checked in the free full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

The highlighted reduction is a within-group result. The categorical responder comparisons between groups were not significant, so superiority over placebo is not established by that analysis.

Applies directly to

Adults with hyperuricemia meeting this trial’s criteria.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 39258191 · DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36401

Publisher access

Open-access article.

Extraction basis

Free full text on PMC and publisher page; identifiers cross-checked in PubMed.

Record revision

2026-08-10