Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen gas inhalation prior to high-intensity training reduces attenuation of nitric oxide bioavailability in male rugby players

Zhao Y, Li C, Zhou S, Xu Z, Huang X, Wen L. · PeerJ. 2024;12:e18503.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2024Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

High-level professional male rugby players with at least six years of professional training.

Intervention and dose

Mask inhalation for 20 minutes beginning one hour before training on each of six training days during the H₂ week. · 66.7% H₂ and 33.3% O₂ from a Wuduoyun X9 hydrogen–oxygen ventilator. The article does not report total gas output at the mask.

Duration

20 minutes before each daily high-intensity session for six days; day 7 was rest.

Reported result

NO, L-arginine/BH4, 8-OHdG, IL-6 and selected antioxidant comparisons favored the H₂/O₂ week. Supplementation-by-time interactions were null for NOS, eNOS, protein carbonyls, IL-1β and IL-10; the article states H₂ did not significantly alter changes in oxidative-damage markers overall. No athletic-performance or injury endpoint was tested.

Main limitation

Biomarker study in 22 male athletes with numerous comparisons and no clinical or performance endpoint. The intervention added oxygen as well as H₂, total flow was omitted and the washout week used lower-intensity rather than no training. Public funding was reported and the authors declared no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

High-level professional male rugby players with at least six years of professional training.

Sample

24 enrolled and randomized; two withdrew because of injury, leaving 22 completing both periods.

Duration

20 minutes before each daily high-intensity session for six days; day 7 was rest.

Intervention

Mask inhalation for 20 minutes beginning one hour before training on each of six training days during the H₂ week.

Hydrogen form

Brown's gas / oxyhydrogen — the generator supplied 66.7% H₂ and 33.3% O₂, not H₂ alone.

Dose or H₂ specification

66.7% H₂ and 33.3% O₂ from a Wuduoyun X9 hydrogen–oxygen ventilator. The article does not report total gas output at the mask.

H₂ flow

Not reported — absolute H₂ flow in mL/min cannot be calculated because total flow was not stated.

O₂ delivered with H₂

33.3% O₂ was co-delivered, but absolute O₂ flow cannot be calculated without total flow.

Comparator

Compressed normal air through a blinded apparatus; one lower-intensity training week separated the two intervention weeks.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

NO, NOS/eNOS, L-arginine, tetrahydrobiopterin, oxidative-damage markers, total antioxidant capacity and IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10.

Reported result

NO, L-arginine/BH4, 8-OHdG, IL-6 and selected antioxidant comparisons favored the H₂/O₂ week. Supplementation-by-time interactions were null for NOS, eNOS, protein carbonyls, IL-1β and IL-10; the article states H₂ did not significantly alter changes in oxidative-damage markers overall. No athletic-performance or injury endpoint was tested.

Extraction completeness

The complete PeerJ/PMC article, protocol, every biomarker family, null interactions, gas composition, withdrawals, funding and declarations were checked; the earlier automatic record is superseded by this manual full-text extraction.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Biomarker study in 22 male athletes with numerous comparisons and no clinical or performance endpoint. The intervention added oxygen as well as H₂, total flow was omitted and the washout week used lower-intensity rather than no training. Public funding was reported and the authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Professional male rugby players under this one-week pre-training biomarker protocol.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 39703911 · DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18503

Publisher access

Open-access full article on PeerJ and PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PeerJ and PMC full article, supplementary training schedule and PubMed metadata; full-text and article-status check completed 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.