Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Pre-Exercise Ingestion of Hydrogen-Rich Cold Water Enhances Endurance Performance and Lactate Response in Heat

Khlifi M, Jebabli N, Ouerghi N, Yagin FH, Dutta AK, Alwhaibi R, Bouassida A. · Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(7):1173.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2025Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthy male sports-science students accustomed to exercising in the heat.

Intervention and dose

Participants drank 500 mL hydrogen-rich cold water 30 minutes before a 20-m shuttle-run test in a hot indoor environment. · Manufacturer-reported dissolved H₂ concentration 1,600 ppb after three minutes of electrolysis; water temperature 1–3°C and oxidation-reduction potential −650 mV. The study did not independently verify the H₂ concentration.

Duration

Single drink 30 minutes before each shuttle-run visit.

Reported result

Maximal aerobic speed and shuttle repetitions favored H₂-rich cold water versus cold-water control. Dehydration, lactate, perceived exertion and feeling scale favored both H₂ water and external precooling versus control, with no significant H₂-versus-external-precooling differences for several of these outcomes. Mean and peak heart rate were null. The body-temperature analysis contained a significant pretest difference and the clearest contrast was external precooling versus control.

Main limitation

Small young-male study; the H₂ condition also used very cold water, the H₂ concentration came from the manufacturer, no room-temperature H₂-water arm separated hydrogen from cooling, dose was not normalized by body mass and many outcomes were compared. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University support and AlMaarefa University acknowledgement were reported; authors declared no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Double-blind counterbalanced crossover trial

Research topic

Exercise and recovery

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy male sports-science students accustomed to exercising in the heat.

Sample

22 men; mean age 19.32±0.84 years. All participants completed all three conditions.

Duration

Single drink 30 minutes before each shuttle-run visit.

Intervention

Participants drank 500 mL hydrogen-rich cold water 30 minutes before a 20-m shuttle-run test in a hot indoor environment.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in cold water — not inhaled gas and not Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

Manufacturer-reported dissolved H₂ concentration 1,600 ppb after three minutes of electrolysis; water temperature 1–3°C and oxidation-reduction potential −650 mV. The study did not independently verify the H₂ concentration.

Comparator

The same 500 mL cold mineral water without H₂, plus a third condition combining cold water with external lower-limb ice-pack precooling; one-week washouts separated visits.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Maximal aerobic speed, shuttle repetitions, dehydration, measured body temperature, heart rate, post-exercise lactate, perceived exertion and feeling scale.

Reported result

Maximal aerobic speed and shuttle repetitions favored H₂-rich cold water versus cold-water control. Dehydration, lactate, perceived exertion and feeling scale favored both H₂ water and external precooling versus control, with no significant H₂-versus-external-precooling differences for several of these outcomes. Mean and peak heart rate were null. The body-temperature analysis contained a significant pretest difference and the clearest contrast was external precooling versus control.

Extraction completeness

The complete MDPI/PMC article, crossover protocol, water preparation, every outcome table and figure, null heart-rate results, funding and conflict disclosure were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small young-male study; the H₂ condition also used very cold water, the H₂ concentration came from the manufacturer, no room-temperature H₂-water arm separated hydrogen from cooling, dose was not normalized by body mass and many outcomes were compared. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University support and AlMaarefa University acknowledgement were reported; authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Young heat-acclimatized men performing one laboratory shuttle-run protocol; not evidence for clinical treatment or long-term training benefit.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 40731803 · DOI: 10.3390/medicina61071173

Publisher access

Open-access full article on MDPI and PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

MDPI XML/full article, PMC full article and PubMed metadata; full-text and article-status check completed 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.