Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Acute hydrogen-rich water ingestion stimulates cardiac autonomic activity in healthy females

Botek M, Sládečková B, Krejčí J, Pluháček F, Najmanová E. · Acta Gymnica. 2021;51:e2021.009.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2021
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Mixed, time-point-specific exploratory signal.

Outcome type

Short-term autonomic surrogate outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Healthy young women.

Sample

14 participants.

Duration

Acute intake with 50 minutes of seated monitoring.

Intervention

1,260 mL hydrogen-rich water consumed within 15 minutes.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in drinking water.

H₂ specification

0.9 ppm dissolved H₂.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — drinking water.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

1,260 mL placebo water containing 0 ppm H₂.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Heart-rate-variability time-domain measures and heart rate.

Reported result

Some HRV comparisons differed at selected time points, while several other comparisons were null.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article methods, intervention, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflict statements were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Very small acute crossover study, many time-point comparisons and surrogate outcomes only.

Applies directly to

Healthy young women during short seated monitoring.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Cochrane RoB 2 — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Randomization and blinding were reported, but the small sample and multiple time-point analyses create imprecision and selective-reporting concerns.

Appraisal domains

Random sequence reported or described · Allocation concealment not fully established · Deviations and co-interventions checked · Outcome measurement checked by endpoint · No outcome-level protocol comparison completed

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

DOI: 10.5507/ag.2021.009 · DOI: 10.5507/ag.2021.009

Publisher access

A free publisher or repository full article was checked.

Extraction basis

Publisher or repository full article and bibliographic record; checked 10 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10