Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen inhalation ameliorates ventilator-induced lung injury

Huang CS et al. · Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R234.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2010
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized mouse mechanical-ventilation experiments using high- and lower-tidal-volume protocols

Research topic

Respiratory health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male C57BL/6 mice undergoing tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation

Sample

High-tidal-volume and sham groups n=8/group; lower-tidal-volume groups n=6/group, with some assays using n=4

Duration

2 hours in the high-tidal-volume experiment and 5 hours in the lower-tidal-volume experiment

Intervention

2% H₂ in air delivered by ventilator or chamber

Hydrogen form

Low-concentration H₂ added to air — not Brown’s gas.

H₂ specification

2% H₂ in air; FiO₂ 0.21; tidal volume 30 mL/kg for 2 hours or 10 mL/kg for 5 hours.

H₂ flow

No fixed H₂ flow in mL/min was reported; delivery depended on the ventilator or spontaneous chamber breathing.

O₂ delivered with H₂

FiO₂ was 21%; no fixed O₂ flow in mL/min was reported.

Comparator

2% nitrogen in air under the same ventilation or sham conditions

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Lung injury and edema, gas exchange, inflammatory mediators, lipid peroxidation, apoptosis and gene expression

Reported result

The article reports less edema, several inflammatory and apoptotic changes and improved gas exchange with H₂. H₂ did not significantly reduce bronchoalveolar total-cell accumulation or leaked protein in the high-tidal-volume protocol.

Results-extraction completeness

Allocation, gas composition, ventilator settings, positive and null results, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Acute mouse ventilation model with extreme tidal volume in one protocol and many laboratory outcomes.

Applies directly to

Ventilator-induced lung injury in mice, not mechanically ventilated patients.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 21184683 · DOI: 10.1186/cc9389

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC/publisher full text and PubMed record; no retraction or expression of concern was shown in the checked records on 7 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10