Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Effects of drinking hydrogen-rich water on the quality of life of patients treated with radiotherapy for liver tumors

Kang KM et al. · Med Gas Res. 2011;1:11.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2011Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

People receiving radiotherapy for malignant liver tumors

Intervention and dose

Hydrogen-rich water, 1.5–2.0 L/day · 0.55–0.65 mM dissolved H₂, generated with magnesium sticks.

Duration

6 weeks from the first day of radiotherapy

Reported result

Several quality-of-life and oxidative-stress measures favored H₂ water, while fatigue, depression, sleep, vomiting and diarrhea did not consistently differ. Tumor response was similar: 48% versus 50%.

Main limitation

Small, short study with heterogeneous liver tumors and questionnaire outcomes. No difference in tumor response was reported. The authors declared no competing interests; the Daimaru Research Foundation funded the work.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized placebo-controlled parallel trial

Research topic

Cancer research

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

People receiving radiotherapy for malignant liver tumors

Sample

49 participants: H₂ water n=25; placebo n=24

Duration

6 weeks from the first day of radiotherapy

Intervention

Hydrogen-rich water, 1.5–2.0 L/day

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

0.55–0.65 mM dissolved H₂, generated with magnesium sticks.

Comparator

Placebo water during radiotherapy

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life, oxidative-stress measures and tumor response

Reported result

Several quality-of-life and oxidative-stress measures favored H₂ water, while fatigue, depression, sleep, vomiting and diarrhea did not consistently differ. Tumor response was similar: 48% versus 50%.

Extraction completeness

Intervention, methods, full results, funding and conflict statement checked in the free full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small, short study with heterogeneous liver tumors and questionnaire outcomes. No difference in tumor response was reported. The authors declared no competing interests; the Daimaru Research Foundation funded the work.

Applies directly to

People receiving radiotherapy for malignant liver tumors under this study’s conditions.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 22146004 · DOI: 10.1186/2045-9912-1-11

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed bibliographic record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.