Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

H(2) gas improves functional outcome after cardiac arrest to an extent comparable to therapeutic hypothermia in a rat model.

Hayashida K, Sano M, Kamimura N, Yokota T, Suzuki M, Maekawa Y, Kawamura A, Abe T, Ohta S, Fukuda K, Hori S. · 2012.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2012Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Rats after ventricular-fibrillation cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Intervention and dose

2% H₂ with 98% O₂ from the start of resuscitation, with or without therapeutic hypothermia. · 2% H₂ and 98% O₂ for two hours after return of spontaneous circulation.

Duration

Gas and temperature intervention through two hours after resuscitation with survival and functional follow-up.

Reported result

H₂ inhalation was reported to improve survival and neurological scores comparably to hypothermia and to favor selected cardiac, inflammatory and oxidative measures.

Main limitation

Animal resuscitation model using 98% oxygen; findings do not establish a clinical cardiac-arrest protocol.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized controlled rat cardiac-arrest study

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Positive preclinical signal.

Outcome type

Animal survival, functional, cardiac and biomarker outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Rats after ventricular-fibrillation cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Sample

Four intervention groups; animal totals and survival denominators were checked in the full article.

Duration

Gas and temperature intervention through two hours after resuscitation with survival and functional follow-up.

Intervention

2% H₂ with 98% O₂ from the start of resuscitation, with or without therapeutic hypothermia.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled molecular H₂ with oxygen.

Dose or H₂ specification

2% H₂ and 98% O₂ for two hours after return of spontaneous circulation.

H₂ flow

Absolute gas flow was not reported separately here.

O₂ delivered with H₂

98% O₂ was co-delivered.

Comparator

Normothermic and hypothermia groups ventilated with 2% N₂/98% O₂.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Survival, neurological deficit, cardiac function, inflammation and oxidative tissue markers.

Reported result

H₂ inhalation was reported to improve survival and neurological scores comparably to hypothermia and to favor selected cardiac, inflammatory and oxidative measures.

Extraction completeness

The full article was checked for methods, intervention details, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflicts. This record does not imply medical efficacy.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Animal resuscitation model using 98% oxygen; findings do not establish a clinical cardiac-arrest protocol.

Applies directly to

The reported rat ventricular-fibrillation arrest model only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Random assignment and active comparators were used, but concealment, blinded assessment and multiplicity handling were incompletely reported.

Appraisal domains

Sequence generation checked where reported · Allocation concealment generally unclear · Personnel blinding generally unclear · Outcome-assessor blinding generally unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 23316300 · DOI: 10.1161/jaha.112.003459

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official PubMed Central full article and PubMed bibliographic record; source identity, methods, intervention, results, funding and conflicts checked 10 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.