Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen–water enhances 5-fluorouracil-induced inhibition of colon cancer

Runtuwene J, Amitani H, Amitani M, Asakawa A, Cheng KC, Inui A. · PeerJ. 2015;3:e859.

PreclinicalH₂-rich waterPublished 2015
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Mouse Colon-26 tumour and cancer-cell experiment with 5-fluorouracil co-treatment

Research topic

Cancer research

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Six-week-old female BALB/c mice bearing intraperitoneal Colon-26 tumours, plus Colon-26 and HepG2 cell cultures.

Sample

Tumour size/weight comparisons report n=7 per group; the article does not provide one consolidated animal total or clear group denominator for every survival curve. Cell assays were commonly triplicate.

Duration

Oral water every eight hours after tumour confirmation; weekly 5-fluorouracil, with tumour excision at day 10 and survival analyses extending beyond the treatment start.

Intervention

High-content H₂ water or natural H₂ water given orally at 250 μL every eight hours, alone or with intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil 100 mg/kg weekly.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

H₂ specification

High-content water was prepared at 0.4 MPa for 24 hours to approximately 0.8 mM; natural water contained 0.125 mM initially and approximately 0.1 mM during monitoring.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — oral H₂-rich water; preparation flow was not reported.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

Milli-Q water, high- and low-content H₂ water, 5-fluorouracil alone and the corresponding combination groups; HepG2 served as a second cell-line comparison.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Mouse survival, tumour size/weight, water/food intake and body weight, cell viability/apoptosis, p-AMPK, AIF, caspase-3 and chemical radical-scavenging assays.

Reported result

The 5-fluorouracil combinations, especially high-content H₂ water, favored survival and tumour measures. H₂ water alone showed only a trend in survival and did not improve body-mass recovery. H₂ did not significantly reduce HepG2 viability, showing the reported cell effect was not general across both lines.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, figures and methods were checked for water concentrations/dose, co-treatment, outcome-specific samples, positive and null results, stated limitation, commercial supply/funding and disclosures.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Small mouse groups with incomplete consolidated allocation reporting, one primary tumour model, combined intervention cannot isolate all H₂ effects, many cell/molecular endpoints and no toxicity assessment comparable with clinical chemotherapy. VanaH supplied natural H₂ water and partly funded the project; authors stated the funder had no role in design, analysis or publication.

Applies directly to

Colon-26 tumour-bearing mice and two cell lines; it does not establish efficacy or safety with fluorouracil in people with colorectal cancer.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 25870767 · DOI: 10.7717/peerj.859

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10