Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen gas inhalation protects against liver ischemia/reperfusion injury by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway

Zhang CB, Tang YC, Xu XJ, Guo SX, Wang HZ. · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2015;9(6):2114-2120.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2015
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Rat concentration/duration screening followed by syngeneic orthotopic liver-transplant comparisons

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male Sprague-Dawley rats undergoing partial hepatic ischemia/reperfusion and syngeneic liver transplantation.

Sample

The three transplant-timing groups contained n=6 each. The article does not consolidate the sample size for every 1%, 2%, 3% and 1-, 3-, 6-hour screening group, so no larger total is inferred.

Duration

Screening exposure for 1, 3 or 6 hours immediately before 90-minute ischemia and 180-minute reperfusion; transplant tissues/blood were sampled over the first three postoperative hours.

Intervention

Conscious rats received 1%, 2% or 3% H₂ mixed with air for 1, 3 or 6 hours immediately before ischemia/reperfusion; 2% for one hour was selected for donor/recipient transplant comparisons.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled H₂ mixed with air — not Brown's gas and not a co-generated H₂/O₂ mixture.

H₂ specification

The source says the gas mixture was delivered through a pipeline at 1.5 mL/hour, but it does not clarify whether this is total-mixture or H₂-only flow. Because that rate is unusually low for the chamber arrangement, Hydrogenology preserves it as reported and does not derive H₂ or O₂ mL/min.

H₂ flow

Not reliably determinable. The article prints 1.5 mL/hour (0.025 mL/min) for the pipeline but does not identify the denominator as total mixture versus H₂ flow.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Air was the carrier; O₂ concentration and O₂ mL/min were not separately reported and are not inferred.

Comparator

Untreated I/R controls; concentration and duration groups; and donor-only, recipient-only, or donor-plus-recipient H₂ exposure around transplantation.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

ALT, AST, IL-6, TNF-α, Egr-1, IL-1β, liver histology/ultrastructure, and NF-κB, HO-1, Bcl-2 and A20 expression.

Reported result

All tested concentrations reduced ALT/AST versus control, with 2% presented as optimal; one hour was selected over longer exposures. The donor-only H₂ group had higher NF-κB/HO-1/Bcl-2/A20 expression than recipient-only or donor-plus-recipient groups. The article does not provide a complete table of every pairwise/null comparison or long-term graft outcomes.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article was checked for concentration and duration screens, the source's ambiguous printed flow, I/R and transplant procedures, timing-group results and available outcome reporting.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Preclinical experiment with incomplete consolidated allocation for the screening phase, unusually/ambiguously reported gas flow, very short follow-up, surrogate biochemical endpoints and inconsistent mechanistic wording around NF-κB activation versus inhibition. No dedicated funding or conflict declaration was identified; absence is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Rat hepatic I/R and transplantation; it does not establish a peri-transplant inhalation protocol or benefit in people.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 26136944 · DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2385

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10